Methodological quality of Russian clinical guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study

Objective. To assess the methodological quality of Russian clinical guidelines using standards developed by specialists at the Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care. Material and methods. A meta-epidemiological study included clinical guidelines for the treatment of children. These guidelines were published on the website of the Russian Ministry of Health and approved in 2024. Quality of guidelines was assessed in several stages. The first stage implied analysis of availability and completeness of information provided in section “Methodology of clinical guidelines”. The second stage assessed compliance of the stated development process with the actual one. All references included in abstracts of guidelines were checked for availability in appropriate databases and compliance with stated searching depth and appropriate publication type. Results. The study included 51 clinical guidelines. All guidelines provided information on methodology. However, comprehensiveness varied and was often insufficient. All guidelines did not provide criteria for inclusion of evidence sources or strategy for their searching and selection. Critical assessment of quality of sources was provided in only one-third of guidelines. Systematic and/or statistical methods of data analysis were not described in all guidelines. Assessment of compliance of the stated development process with the actual one was possible for only half of guidelines. The stated development process matched the actual one in none case. Conclusion. The recently approved Russian clinical guidelines are characterized by unsatisfactory methodological quality and do not comply with the stated development process.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Technologies Assessment and Choice
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/medtech20264802158
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological quality of Russian clinical guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study

Olesya V. Zakharova
Medical Technologies Assessment and Choice
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

Methodological quality of Russian clinical guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study

Olesya V. Zakharova
article en

Abstract

Objective. To assess the methodological quality of Russian clinical guidelines using standards developed by specialists at the Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care. Material and methods. A meta-epidemiological study included clinical guidelines for the treatment of children. These guidelines were published on the website of the Russian Ministry of Health and approved in 2024. Quality of guidelines was assessed in several stages. The first stage implied analysis of availability and completeness of information provided in section “Methodology of clinical guidelines”. The second stage assessed compliance of the stated development process with the actual one. All references included in abstracts of guidelines were checked for availability in appropriate databases and compliance with stated searching depth and appropriate publication type. Results. The study included 51 clinical guidelines. All guidelines provided information on methodology. However, comprehensiveness varied and was often insufficient. All guidelines did not provide criteria for inclusion of evidence sources or strategy for their searching and selection. Critical assessment of quality of sources was provided in only one-third of guidelines. Systematic and/or statistical methods of data analysis were not described in all guidelines. Assessment of compliance of the stated development process with the actual one was possible for only half of guidelines. The stated development process matched the actual one in none case. Conclusion. The recently approved Russian clinical guidelines are characterized by unsatisfactory methodological quality and do not comply with the stated development process.

Medical Technologies Assessment and ChoiceVol. 48(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.