Transcranial direct current stimulation in affecting neuropsychiatric symptoms of post-COVID syndrome: No change in microstates and functional connectivity

INTRODUCTION: Neuropsychiatric symptoms of post-covid syndrome (PCS) involve fatigue, brain fog, cognitive impairment, or symptoms of depression and anxiety. These symptoms are in other diagnoses associated with electroencephalography (EEG) changes in microstates and functional connectivity. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective in alleviating certain abovementioned symptoms in other diagnoses. The main objective was to evaluate EEG changes in PCS patients after tDCS intervention. METHODS: A randomised control trial (registered in ISRCTN database, No.: ISRCTN10942585) with 35 participants (n = 33 received the intervention) involved 20 applications (over four weeks) of tDCS (anode over F3, cathode over F4, duration 30 min, intensity 2mA). Participants were divided into active (n = 16) and sham (n = 17) groups. Resting-state EEG was measured at baseline, after two weeks (T1), and after the intervention (four weeks, T2) as an exploratory endpoint. Microstates and functional connectivity between F3 and F4 were analysed; differences between active and sham groups in change from baseline to T1 and from baseline to T2 were evaluated. RESULTS: EEG measurements from 26 participants (n = 13 for active and n = 13 for sham group) were included into the statistical analysis. No significant results were found. No serious adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a significant difference in selected EEG parameters between active and sham groups. The possible reasons include choice of tDCS parameters (electrode montage or stimulation duration), and EEG variables selected for evaluation (microstates and functional connectivity). These results are in line with the results of cognitive and clinical assessment. However, the EEG endpoints were exploratory and the study was primarily powered for clinical results, therefore small effects cannot be excluded due to limited statistical power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0351407
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transcranial direct current stimulation in affecting neuropsychiatric symptoms of post-COVID syndrome: No change in microstates and functional connectivity

Stanislav Jiříček, Václava Piorecká, Jan Hubený, Olga Laskov et al.
PLoS ONE
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Transcranial direct current stimulation in affecting neuropsychiatric symptoms of post-COVID syndrome: No change in microstates and functional connectivity

Stanislav Jiříček, Václava Piorecká, Jan Hubený, Olga Laskov, Monika Klírová, Andrea Adamová, Nina Biačková, Vlastimil Koudelka, Jan Štrobl, Natálie-Anna Böhmová, Anna Čechová
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Neuropsychiatric symptoms of post-covid syndrome (PCS) involve fatigue, brain fog, cognitive impairment, or symptoms of depression and anxiety. These symptoms are in other diagnoses associated with electroencephalography (EEG) changes in microstates and functional connectivity. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective in alleviating certain abovementioned symptoms in other diagnoses. The main objective was to evaluate EEG changes in PCS patients after tDCS intervention. METHODS: A randomised control trial (registered in ISRCTN database, No.: ISRCTN10942585) with 35 participants (n = 33 received the intervention) involved 20 applications (over four weeks) of tDCS (anode over F3, cathode over F4, duration 30 min, intensity 2mA). Participants were divided into active (n = 16) and sham (n = 17) groups. Resting-state EEG was measured at baseline, after two weeks (T1), and after the intervention (four weeks, T2) as an exploratory endpoint. Microstates and functional connectivity between F3 and F4 were analysed; differences between active and sham groups in change from baseline to T1 and from baseline to T2 were evaluated. RESULTS: EEG measurements from 26 participants (n = 13 for active and n = 13 for sham group) were included into the statistical analysis. No significant results were found. No serious adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a significant difference in selected EEG parameters between active and sham groups. The possible reasons include choice of tDCS parameters (electrode montage or stimulation duration), and EEG variables selected for evaluation (microstates and functional connectivity). These results are in line with the results of cognitive and clinical assessment. However, the EEG endpoints were exploratory and the study was primarily powered for clinical results, therefore small effects cannot be excluded due to limited statistical power.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ), Charles University (CZ), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computer Science (CZ), National Institute of Mental Health (CZ), Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova, European Regional Development Fund
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.