Long-term effectiveness and overdiagnosis in the NHS breast screening programme: a cohort study with up to 33 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND: Population-based mammographic screening programmes have been operating for over 30 years and whilst many studies have assessed the short- to medium-term effectiveness of screening, few have assessed their long-term effectiveness. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effectiveness of the NHS Breast Screening Programme in England and Wales. METHODS: 2,509,384 women aged 49-64 years and uninvited to screening upon study entry were studied, with screening status changing on invitation and attendance. Women were followed for breast cancer diagnosis and death for a maximum of 33 years. Poisson regression was used to assess the effect of screening on breast cancer incidence and mortality compared to an uninvited comparison group, and overdiagnosis. RESULTS: After adjustment for confounders, invitation to screening was associated with a 28% reduction in breast cancer mortality (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.71-0.74) and attendance at screening was associated with a 33% reduction (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.65-0.69). There was a 4% excess of breast cancer diagnoses associated with being screened (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.07) with at least 5 years follow-up post-screening. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that screening continues to be effective in reducing breast cancer mortality many years after cessation of screening and that the level of overdiagnosis associated with long-term follow-up is low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-026-03493-z
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term effectiveness and overdiagnosis in the NHS breast screening programme: a cohort study with up to 33 years of follow-up

Robert Allen Smith, Dharmishta Parmar, Rhian Gabe, Stephen William Duffy et al.
British Journal of Cancer
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Long-term effectiveness and overdiagnosis in the NHS breast screening programme: a cohort study with up to 33 years of follow-up

Robert Allen Smith, Dharmishta Parmar, Rhian Gabe, Stephen William Duffy, Amanda Dibden, Louise Johns, Sue M. Moss
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population-based mammographic screening programmes have been operating for over 30 years and whilst many studies have assessed the short- to medium-term effectiveness of screening, few have assessed their long-term effectiveness. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effectiveness of the NHS Breast Screening Programme in England and Wales. METHODS: 2,509,384 women aged 49-64 years and uninvited to screening upon study entry were studied, with screening status changing on invitation and attendance. Women were followed for breast cancer diagnosis and death for a maximum of 33 years. Poisson regression was used to assess the effect of screening on breast cancer incidence and mortality compared to an uninvited comparison group, and overdiagnosis. RESULTS: After adjustment for confounders, invitation to screening was associated with a 28% reduction in breast cancer mortality (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.71-0.74) and attendance at screening was associated with a 33% reduction (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.65-0.69). There was a 4% excess of breast cancer diagnoses associated with being screened (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.07) with at least 5 years follow-up post-screening. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that screening continues to be effective in reducing breast cancer mortality many years after cessation of screening and that the level of overdiagnosis associated with long-term follow-up is low.

British Journal of Cancer
American Cancer Society (US), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.