Reducing Dementia-Related Stigma: A Meta-Analytic Review of Interventions

Dementia is a prevalent diagnosis, with individuals and their families affected by disease challenges including dementia-related stigma. Dementia-related stigma may lead to isolation, infantilization, discrimination, and a poorer quality of life. Stigma-reduction interventions have been implemented to combat these harms. This meta-analytic review examined seven dementia-related stigma reduction studies, totaling 13 interventions and 26 effect sizes. Overall, treatment groups had nonsignificant reductions in stigmatizing views ( g = −.24) and improved quality of life ( g = .20). Quality of life was a significant predictor of stigma reduction ( β = −1.0732, P = .004), even though a nonsignificant correlation between quality of life and stigma was found ( r = −.49, P = .09). This meta-analytic review highlights the difficult-to-change nature of dementia-related stigma, as well as the dearth of consensus among the field when it comes to intervention methods and measurement protocols for nuanced phenomena like stigma or quality of life.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Aging and Human Development
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150261462110
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing Dementia-Related Stigma: A Meta-Analytic Review of Interventions

Shannon Pappas, Lily G. Gorman
The International Journal of Aging and Human Development
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Reducing Dementia-Related Stigma: A Meta-Analytic Review of Interventions

Shannon Pappas, Lily G. Gorman
article en

Abstract

Dementia is a prevalent diagnosis, with individuals and their families affected by disease challenges including dementia-related stigma. Dementia-related stigma may lead to isolation, infantilization, discrimination, and a poorer quality of life. Stigma-reduction interventions have been implemented to combat these harms. This meta-analytic review examined seven dementia-related stigma reduction studies, totaling 13 interventions and 26 effect sizes. Overall, treatment groups had nonsignificant reductions in stigmatizing views ( g = −.24) and improved quality of life ( g = .20). Quality of life was a significant predictor of stigma reduction ( β = −1.0732, P = .004), even though a nonsignificant correlation between quality of life and stigma was found ( r = −.49, P = .09). This meta-analytic review highlights the difficult-to-change nature of dementia-related stigma, as well as the dearth of consensus among the field when it comes to intervention methods and measurement protocols for nuanced phenomena like stigma or quality of life.

The International Journal of Aging and Human Development
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.