Opinions of digital technology held by independent-living older people: a survey and generational comparison

Services delivered using digital technologies, including technology-enabled care services (TECS), have been proposed to help people age independently and well in their own homes. However, the uptake of digital services by older users appears uneven, suggesting that opportunities to assist people are being missed. A better understanding of older people’s attitudes towards digital technologies and TECS could help to address this issue. Evidence of the attitudes held by independent-living older people was gathered through a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of people aged 55 and over. The participants were residents of independent-living schemes and community-dwelling members of local communities. A total of 230 people completed the questionnaire. The participants’ responses were analysed in aggregate and in comparative terms, according to the ‘technology generation’ to which each participant belongs. The participants were generally positive about digital technologies and TECSs, which suggests that digital services play a role in supporting people in their ability to age well. Considering these results should aid in the development of effective TECS. However, participants also express misgivings about digital technologies; this was particularly marked in the case of the generation aged 75 and older. Generational differences suggest that different strategies are required that consider older people’s distinct opinions and experiences with technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Gerontology
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/28324897.2026.2692811
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opinions of digital technology held by independent-living older people: a survey and generational comparison

Mark Hawley, Stephen Potter
Cogent Gerontology
Technology Use by Older Adults
article

Opinions of digital technology held by independent-living older people: a survey and generational comparison

Mark Hawley, Stephen Potter
article en

Abstract

Services delivered using digital technologies, including technology-enabled care services (TECS), have been proposed to help people age independently and well in their own homes. However, the uptake of digital services by older users appears uneven, suggesting that opportunities to assist people are being missed. A better understanding of older people’s attitudes towards digital technologies and TECS could help to address this issue. Evidence of the attitudes held by independent-living older people was gathered through a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of people aged 55 and over. The participants were residents of independent-living schemes and community-dwelling members of local communities. A total of 230 people completed the questionnaire. The participants’ responses were analysed in aggregate and in comparative terms, according to the ‘technology generation’ to which each participant belongs. The participants were generally positive about digital technologies and TECSs, which suggests that digital services play a role in supporting people in their ability to age well. Considering these results should aid in the development of effective TECS. However, participants also express misgivings about digital technologies; this was particularly marked in the case of the generation aged 75 and older. Generational differences suggest that different strategies are required that consider older people’s distinct opinions and experiences with technologies.

Cogent GerontologyVol. 5(1)
University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Technology Use by Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.