Preoperative volume status in vascular access creation: A despised influence?

Background: The most common causes of early primary failures of a vascular access (VA) is related to small caliber vessels. Weight gain between dialyses expands both extracellular and blood volume, which may lead to rises in intravascular filling and vessels caliber. If patients presented after weekend, their weight and probably volemia would be higher. We hypothesized that preoperative volume status may influence vascular filling and vessels diameter with a significant impact on VA outcomes. Methods: A clinical, prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center within-patient physiological crossover evaluation trial. Inclusion criteria: age 18–80 years, under regular hemodialysis (three per week) Exclusion criteria: >3 sessions/week, heart failure (HF), and acute pulmonary edema on the previous year. Before the last-week session, patient’s clinical parameters were recorded. BIA and ultrasound vascular mapping were performed. After this first evaluation, dry weight was increased 0.5 kg, and after weekend, the same protocol was conducted. Primary end point was to compare vein diameters. Results: One hundred twenty-six vessels were evaluated (84 veins and 42 arteries) from 21 patients. Mean age was 69 ± 10 years and 52% female. Other than humeral arterial blood flow, every parameters evaluated through ultrasound mapping significantly increased ( p < 0.05), however, most patients had a mild-moderate OH (86%–90%). Patient-level paired analysis confirmed a significant increase in mean venous diameter after volume expansion ( p = 0.002). No complications were reported. Conclusions: Preoperative volume status appears to be an underrecognized and potentially modifiable determinant of vascular access conditions. Mild preoperative volume expansion was associated with increased venous diameter, a surrogate for AVF feasibility and maturation. BIA and lung ultrasound may be future tools that combined to vascular ultrasound could be a safe and effective way to optimize and evaluate preoperative conditions to improve VA outcomes. Future multicenter prospective studies should assess whether preoperative volume optimization translates into improved AVF creation, maturation, and long-term patency outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Vascular Access
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298261461436
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative volume status in vascular access creation: A despised influence?

Pedro Maia, Maria Guedes Marques, Ana Martins, Pedro Ponce
The Journal of Vascular Access
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Preoperative volume status in vascular access creation: A despised influence?

Pedro Maia, Maria Guedes Marques, Ana Martins, Pedro Ponce
article en

Abstract

Background: The most common causes of early primary failures of a vascular access (VA) is related to small caliber vessels. Weight gain between dialyses expands both extracellular and blood volume, which may lead to rises in intravascular filling and vessels caliber. If patients presented after weekend, their weight and probably volemia would be higher. We hypothesized that preoperative volume status may influence vascular filling and vessels diameter with a significant impact on VA outcomes. Methods: A clinical, prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center within-patient physiological crossover evaluation trial. Inclusion criteria: age 18–80 years, under regular hemodialysis (three per week) Exclusion criteria: >3 sessions/week, heart failure (HF), and acute pulmonary edema on the previous year. Before the last-week session, patient’s clinical parameters were recorded. BIA and ultrasound vascular mapping were performed. After this first evaluation, dry weight was increased 0.5 kg, and after weekend, the same protocol was conducted. Primary end point was to compare vein diameters. Results: One hundred twenty-six vessels were evaluated (84 veins and 42 arteries) from 21 patients. Mean age was 69 ± 10 years and 52% female. Other than humeral arterial blood flow, every parameters evaluated through ultrasound mapping significantly increased ( p < 0.05), however, most patients had a mild-moderate OH (86%–90%). Patient-level paired analysis confirmed a significant increase in mean venous diameter after volume expansion ( p = 0.002). No complications were reported. Conclusions: Preoperative volume status appears to be an underrecognized and potentially modifiable determinant of vascular access conditions. Mild preoperative volume expansion was associated with increased venous diameter, a surrogate for AVF feasibility and maturation. BIA and lung ultrasound may be future tools that combined to vascular ultrasound could be a safe and effective way to optimize and evaluate preoperative conditions to improve VA outcomes. Future multicenter prospective studies should assess whether preoperative volume optimization translates into improved AVF creation, maturation, and long-term patency outcomes.

The Journal of Vascular Access
NephroCare (ES), University of Coimbra (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.