Radiation exposure to equine surgeons during simulated digital radiography and fluoroscopy‐guided fracture fixation of the distal limb

OBJECTIVE: Despite known occupational radiation risks, data on exposure during digital radiography (DR) or fluoroscopy-guided equine fracture repair are lacking. This study quantified radiation doses to a model surgeon's hand, lenses, thyroid, and gonads, and assessed protective effects of radiation-reducing surgical gloves and attenuating ointment. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative, controlled, simulation-based study. ANIMAL/SAMPLE POPULATION: Anthropomorphic model. METHODS: Distal limb fracture fixation was simulated using a model with dosimeters at the region of the lenses, thyroid, gonads, drill-holding hand, and under a lead apron (fetal dose). Radiation was measured over 10 DR or 10 single-image fluoroscopy exposures, then repeated using radiation-reducing surgical gloves or ointment. RESULTS: All radiation doses were below occupational limits. Dosimeters placed at the level of the gonads (outside the gown) received the highest mean dose (DR: 6.87 ± 0.40 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.98 ± 0.28 μSv), followed by thyroid (outside the gown) (DR: 2.60 ± 0.52 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.48 ± 0.08 μSv), hand (DR: 2.02 ± 0.54 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.32 ± 0.06 μSv) and lenses (DR: 1.25 ± 0.28 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.23 ± 0.07 μSv). The lowest exposure was measured underneath the gown (fetal dose) (DR: 0.01 ± 0.01 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.01 ± 0.01 μSv). DR exposure exceeded fluoroscopy at all sites (p < .001). Radiation-reducing surgical gloves significantly lowered hand dose (p < .001), whereas ointment had no effect (p = .54). Off-beam hand exposure from 10 images was approximately one-millionth of the annual dose limit. CONCLUSION: Image-guided equine distal limb fracture fixation results in minimal hand radiation exposure, relative to other regions of the body, with DR producing higher doses than single-image fluoroscopy. Radiation-reducing surgical gloves significantly lower hand exposure during DR procedures. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Radiation-reducing surgical gloves offer additional protection and are recommended during image-guided surgery. Whenever feasible, pulsed fluoroscopy should be preferred over DR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Surgery
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70126
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiation exposure to equine surgeons during simulated digital radiography and fluoroscopy‐guided fracture fixation of the distal limb

Susanne M. Stieger‐Vanegas, Katja F. Duesterdieck‐Zellmer, J. Lacy Kamm, Michael Huber et al.
Veterinary Surgery
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Radiation exposure to equine surgeons during simulated digital radiography and fluoroscopy‐guided fracture fixation of the distal limb

Susanne M. Stieger‐Vanegas, Katja F. Duesterdieck‐Zellmer, J. Lacy Kamm, Michael Huber, Julia L. Gaida, Christoph J. Lischer
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite known occupational radiation risks, data on exposure during digital radiography (DR) or fluoroscopy-guided equine fracture repair are lacking. This study quantified radiation doses to a model surgeon's hand, lenses, thyroid, and gonads, and assessed protective effects of radiation-reducing surgical gloves and attenuating ointment. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative, controlled, simulation-based study. ANIMAL/SAMPLE POPULATION: Anthropomorphic model. METHODS: Distal limb fracture fixation was simulated using a model with dosimeters at the region of the lenses, thyroid, gonads, drill-holding hand, and under a lead apron (fetal dose). Radiation was measured over 10 DR or 10 single-image fluoroscopy exposures, then repeated using radiation-reducing surgical gloves or ointment. RESULTS: All radiation doses were below occupational limits. Dosimeters placed at the level of the gonads (outside the gown) received the highest mean dose (DR: 6.87 ± 0.40 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.98 ± 0.28 μSv), followed by thyroid (outside the gown) (DR: 2.60 ± 0.52 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.48 ± 0.08 μSv), hand (DR: 2.02 ± 0.54 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.32 ± 0.06 μSv) and lenses (DR: 1.25 ± 0.28 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.23 ± 0.07 μSv). The lowest exposure was measured underneath the gown (fetal dose) (DR: 0.01 ± 0.01 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.01 ± 0.01 μSv). DR exposure exceeded fluoroscopy at all sites (p < .001). Radiation-reducing surgical gloves significantly lowered hand dose (p < .001), whereas ointment had no effect (p = .54). Off-beam hand exposure from 10 images was approximately one-millionth of the annual dose limit. CONCLUSION: Image-guided equine distal limb fracture fixation results in minimal hand radiation exposure, relative to other regions of the body, with DR producing higher doses than single-image fluoroscopy. Radiation-reducing surgical gloves significantly lower hand exposure during DR procedures. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Radiation-reducing surgical gloves offer additional protection and are recommended during image-guided surgery. Whenever feasible, pulsed fluoroscopy should be preferred over DR.

Veterinary Surgery
Oregon State University (US), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
American College of Veterinary Surgeons Foundation, Carlson College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.