Prevalence of hyperuricemia in preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from low - and middle - income countries

BACKGROUND: Hyperuricemia is a recognized biochemical finding in preeclampsia (PE), but the reported frequency varies across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A pooled estimate from LMIC settings may help clarify the extent of this finding in hospital-based populations. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the pooled prevalence of hyperuricemia among women with preeclampsia in hospital-based studies from LMICs. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251107624). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Lens.org were searched for observational studies published from 2010 to 2025 reporting hyperuricemia among women with preeclampsia in LMIC hospital settings. Prevalence estimates were pooled using a random-effects model with logit transformation. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q, Tau², and I². Sensitivity analyses included subgrouping by hyperuricemia threshold and leave-one-out analysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 1,099 women with preeclampsia from seven LMICs were included. The pooled prevalence of hyperuricemia was 53.47% (95% CI: 45.17% to 61.58%), with low-to-moderate heterogeneity (I² = 27.47%, p = 0.204). Included studies used different diagnostic thresholds for hyperuricemia, ranging from 5.0 to 7.0 mg/dL. All studies were hospital-based, and reporting of gestational age at the time of uric acid measurement was inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperuricemia was common among women with preeclampsia in hospital-based LMIC studies. These findings describe prevalence only and should not be interpreted as evidence of diagnostic accuracy, prognostic performance, or clinical utility. Future studies should standardize diagnostic thresholds and report gestational timing of uric acid measurement more consistently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345152
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of hyperuricemia in preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from low - and middle - income countries

Jackson Kakooza, Catherine R Lewis, Theoneste Hakizimana, Fathi Ali Araye et al.
PLoS ONE
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Prevalence of hyperuricemia in preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from low - and middle - income countries

Jackson Kakooza, Catherine R Lewis, Theoneste Hakizimana, Fathi Ali Araye, Sowda Abdikarim, Fatima Abdirizak Muse, Akankwasa Prosper, Hamdi Jama, Emmanuel Okurut, Fardowso Dahir Warsame, Luswata Herbert, Deqa Abdulsalam, Fatima Abdallah Noor
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hyperuricemia is a recognized biochemical finding in preeclampsia (PE), but the reported frequency varies across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A pooled estimate from LMIC settings may help clarify the extent of this finding in hospital-based populations. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the pooled prevalence of hyperuricemia among women with preeclampsia in hospital-based studies from LMICs. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251107624). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Lens.org were searched for observational studies published from 2010 to 2025 reporting hyperuricemia among women with preeclampsia in LMIC hospital settings. Prevalence estimates were pooled using a random-effects model with logit transformation. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q, Tau², and I². Sensitivity analyses included subgrouping by hyperuricemia threshold and leave-one-out analysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 1,099 women with preeclampsia from seven LMICs were included. The pooled prevalence of hyperuricemia was 53.47% (95% CI: 45.17% to 61.58%), with low-to-moderate heterogeneity (I² = 27.47%, p = 0.204). Included studies used different diagnostic thresholds for hyperuricemia, ranging from 5.0 to 7.0 mg/dL. All studies were hospital-based, and reporting of gestational age at the time of uric acid measurement was inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperuricemia was common among women with preeclampsia in hospital-based LMIC studies. These findings describe prevalence only and should not be interpreted as evidence of diagnostic accuracy, prognostic performance, or clinical utility. Future studies should standardize diagnostic thresholds and report gestational timing of uric acid measurement more consistently.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
Kampala International University (UG), Kitovu Hospital (UG)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.