Evaluation of Phantom Doping Materials in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

ABSTRACT Purpose To measure magnetic susceptibility ( χ ) with Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) and evaluate its repeatability using four phantom doping materials relevant to QSM applications. Methods A cylindrical phantom was constructed containing vials of agarose gel doped with two paramagnetic materials (ferritin, USPIO) and two diamagnetic materials (CaCl 2 , CaCO 3 ) at five concentrations each. Single orientation QSM measurements (MEDI+0) were carried out on the phantom at 3 and 7 T. We measured molar susceptibility ( χ mol ) from QSM and evaluated the precision of QSM measurements using the standard deviation of the ROI measurement (SD ROI ). We evaluated material lifespan by conducting a t ‐test of χ mol at various timepoints. Results χ mol (ppm L mmol −1 ) were measured as 1.67 ± 0.24 and 0.74 ± 0.09 (USPIO: 3 and 7 T, respectively), 10 −2 × (8.13 ± 1.35; 8.13 ± 1.19) (Ferritin: 3; 7 T), 10 −4 × (−2.68 ± 0.24; −2.71 ± 0.37) (CaCl 2 : 3; 7 T), and 10 −5 × (−9.52 ± 1.44; −9.53 ± 1.18) (CaCO 3 : 3; 7 T). We observed no significant changes in molar susceptibility for ferritin and CaCO 3 over the measured timeframes (24 and 15 months, respectively). Conclusion We recommend using ferritin as a paramagnetic dopant. Further research is required to identify a diamagnetic dopant with a lower electrical conductivity and a lower ratio of R 2 */ B 0 to χ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70427
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Phantom Doping Materials in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Simon Robinson, Markus Barth, Jin Jin, Padriac Hooper et al.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Evaluation of Phantom Doping Materials in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Simon Robinson, Markus Barth, Jin Jin, Padriac Hooper, Kieran O'Brien, Monique Tourell
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose To measure magnetic susceptibility ( χ ) with Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) and evaluate its repeatability using four phantom doping materials relevant to QSM applications. Methods A cylindrical phantom was constructed containing vials of agarose gel doped with two paramagnetic materials (ferritin, USPIO) and two diamagnetic materials (CaCl 2 , CaCO 3 ) at five concentrations each. Single orientation QSM measurements (MEDI+0) were carried out on the phantom at 3 and 7 T. We measured molar susceptibility ( χ mol ) from QSM and evaluated the precision of QSM measurements using the standard deviation of the ROI measurement (SD ROI ). We evaluated material lifespan by conducting a t ‐test of χ mol at various timepoints. Results χ mol (ppm L mmol −1 ) were measured as 1.67 ± 0.24 and 0.74 ± 0.09 (USPIO: 3 and 7 T, respectively), 10 −2 × (8.13 ± 1.35; 8.13 ± 1.19) (Ferritin: 3; 7 T), 10 −4 × (−2.68 ± 0.24; −2.71 ± 0.37) (CaCl 2 : 3; 7 T), and 10 −5 × (−9.52 ± 1.44; −9.53 ± 1.18) (CaCO 3 : 3; 7 T). We observed no significant changes in molar susceptibility for ferritin and CaCO 3 over the measured timeframes (24 and 15 months, respectively). Conclusion We recommend using ferritin as a paramagnetic dopant. Further research is required to identify a diamagnetic dopant with a lower electrical conductivity and a lower ratio of R 2 */ B 0 to χ .

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Christian Doppler Laboratory for Thermoelectricity (AT), ARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging (AU), Siemens Healthcare (United States) (US), ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture (AU), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.