DR Testing Is Dead: Long Live Continuous Resilience Validation

For years, disaster-recovery testing was a periodic ritual: a scheduled weekend, an activated runbook, a controlled failover, and a checked box. This paper argues that in a cloud-first, automation-driven world the traditional DR test no longer validates resilience; it validates preparation for a single moment under controlled conditions while real failures occur continuously and unpredictably. It sets out why event-based testing is fragile, defines continuous resilience validation as an alternative that embeds readiness into everyday operations, identifies the enabling technologies, infrastructure as code, observability, automation, and chaos engineering, and presents a real practitioner evolution from twice-yearly tests to daily, metric-driven validation. A phased adoption path, the common challenges, and the business and regulatory case are provided.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20857528
Primary Topic
Software System Performance and Reliability
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

DR Testing Is Dead: Long Live Continuous Resilience Validation

Puneet Khatri
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Software System Performance and Reliability
preprint

DR Testing Is Dead: Long Live Continuous Resilience Validation

Puneet Khatri
preprint en

Abstract

For years, disaster-recovery testing was a periodic ritual: a scheduled weekend, an activated runbook, a controlled failover, and a checked box. This paper argues that in a cloud-first, automation-driven world the traditional DR test no longer validates resilience; it validates preparation for a single moment under controlled conditions while real failures occur continuously and unpredictably. It sets out why event-based testing is fragile, defines continuous resilience validation as an alternative that embeds readiness into everyday operations, identifies the enabling technologies, infrastructure as code, observability, automation, and chaos engineering, and presents a real practitioner evolution from twice-yearly tests to daily, metric-driven validation. A phased adoption path, the common challenges, and the business and regulatory case are provided.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Climate action
Software System Performance and Reliability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.