In-depth analysis of sampling practice and yield of blood cultures

PURPOSE: To describe BC collection practices at a tertiary care university hospital in a prospective observational study and examine the association between blood volume and culture yield. METHODS: Analysis of all blood cultures collected during a 6-week period in 2023 at St Olav's University Hospital, Norway. Additionally, we analysed impact of antimicrobial treatment prior to sampling, sampling department, bottle type, sampling time and method, microorganisms isolated as well as patient age and sex. RESULTS: Only 19.7% of BC bottles were filled with the recommended 8-10 mL of blood. The overall pathogen positivity rate of all BC bottles was 6.8%, while 13.3% of the patients had at least one positive BC bottle. Patients >60 years were twice as likely to have a positive blood culture as those aged 18-60 years (16.2% vs 8.1%). Recommended filling volumes were positively associated with recovery of microbes, whereas particularly overfilling >14 mL was associated with reduced microbial yield. Overall, bottles with no growth contained a significantly higher mean blood volume than bottles with growth. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the gap between established recommendations for BC collection and current practice at our hospital. Preanalytical optimisation of BC collection is needed to improve diagnostic yield in this seriously ill patient population. Overfilling of BC bottles was negatively associated with microbial yield and should be avoided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-026-05568-4
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-depth analysis of sampling practice and yield of blood cultures

Frode Width Gran, Jan Kristian Damås, Jan Egil Afset, Birgitta Ehrnström et al.
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

In-depth analysis of sampling practice and yield of blood cultures

Frode Width Gran, Jan Kristian Damås, Jan Egil Afset, Birgitta Ehrnström, Thea Kippersund Rønningen
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe BC collection practices at a tertiary care university hospital in a prospective observational study and examine the association between blood volume and culture yield. METHODS: Analysis of all blood cultures collected during a 6-week period in 2023 at St Olav's University Hospital, Norway. Additionally, we analysed impact of antimicrobial treatment prior to sampling, sampling department, bottle type, sampling time and method, microorganisms isolated as well as patient age and sex. RESULTS: Only 19.7% of BC bottles were filled with the recommended 8-10 mL of blood. The overall pathogen positivity rate of all BC bottles was 6.8%, while 13.3% of the patients had at least one positive BC bottle. Patients >60 years were twice as likely to have a positive blood culture as those aged 18-60 years (16.2% vs 8.1%). Recommended filling volumes were positively associated with recovery of microbes, whereas particularly overfilling >14 mL was associated with reduced microbial yield. Overall, bottles with no growth contained a significantly higher mean blood volume than bottles with growth. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the gap between established recommendations for BC collection and current practice at our hospital. Preanalytical optimisation of BC collection is needed to improve diagnostic yield in this seriously ill patient population. Overfilling of BC bottles was negatively associated with microbial yield and should be avoided.

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), St Olav's University Hospital (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.