Using multiomic data to predict postoperative complications after major surgery in the UK Biobank cohort

<ns5:p>Background Whilst high-dimensional omic profiles from biobanks can predict long-term disease outcomes, their ability to predict postoperative outcomes is unknown. We investigated whether adding metabolomic and proteomic data from historic samples to standard clinical variables improved the prediction of postoperative complications. Methods We analysed data from 158,156 UK Biobank participants who underwent major surgery. The primary outcomes were postoperative atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury, acute myocardial infarction, delirium, stroke and surgical site infection. We developed machine learning models (elastic net penalised regression) to compare baseline clinical variables against integrated single- and multiomic datasets. To address sample size constraints in high-dimensional omic subsets, we employed transfer learning from related non-postoperative domains. Results The numbers of cases with omic data varied across outcome phenotypes and feature sets: metabolomic: 144–1596, proteomic: 27–289 and multiomic: 15–219. Baseline clinical models achieved robust predictive performance (AUROC 0.72–0.88, sensitivity 0.71–0.80). The addition of metabolomic and/or proteomic features provided no clinically meaningful improvement in discriminative performance metrics for any clinical phenotypes. Transfer learning from the non-postoperative domain improved model performance and stability but did not outperform baseline clinical models. Conclusions The addition of metabolomic and proteomic data from samples collected at a temporal distance from surgery does not improve preoperative risk prediction compared to standard clinical variables. The lack of incremental predictive value suggests that long-term biological trajectories have become manifest in routine clinical data by the time of surgery. The success of transfer learning from non-postoperative settings may indicate shared biological risk between chronic and acute phenotypes.</ns5:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wellcome Open Research
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.26850.1
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using multiomic data to predict postoperative complications after major surgery in the UK Biobank cohort

R. A. Armstrong, Golam M Khandaker, Ben Gibbison, Paul Yousefi et al.
Wellcome Open Research
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Using multiomic data to predict postoperative complications after major surgery in the UK Biobank cohort

R. A. Armstrong, Golam M Khandaker, Ben Gibbison, Paul Yousefi, Tom R Gaunt
article en

Abstract

<ns5:p>Background Whilst high-dimensional omic profiles from biobanks can predict long-term disease outcomes, their ability to predict postoperative outcomes is unknown. We investigated whether adding metabolomic and proteomic data from historic samples to standard clinical variables improved the prediction of postoperative complications. Methods We analysed data from 158,156 UK Biobank participants who underwent major surgery. The primary outcomes were postoperative atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury, acute myocardial infarction, delirium, stroke and surgical site infection. We developed machine learning models (elastic net penalised regression) to compare baseline clinical variables against integrated single- and multiomic datasets. To address sample size constraints in high-dimensional omic subsets, we employed transfer learning from related non-postoperative domains. Results The numbers of cases with omic data varied across outcome phenotypes and feature sets: metabolomic: 144–1596, proteomic: 27–289 and multiomic: 15–219. Baseline clinical models achieved robust predictive performance (AUROC 0.72–0.88, sensitivity 0.71–0.80). The addition of metabolomic and/or proteomic features provided no clinically meaningful improvement in discriminative performance metrics for any clinical phenotypes. Transfer learning from the non-postoperative domain improved model performance and stability but did not outperform baseline clinical models. Conclusions The addition of metabolomic and proteomic data from samples collected at a temporal distance from surgery does not improve preoperative risk prediction compared to standard clinical variables. The lack of incremental predictive value suggests that long-term biological trajectories have become manifest in routine clinical data by the time of surgery. The success of transfer learning from non-postoperative settings may indicate shared biological risk between chronic and acute phenotypes.</ns5:p>

Wellcome Open ResearchVol. 11
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust (GB), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Bristol (GB), NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
Wellcome Trust
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.