Entropy, Uncertainty, and Directionality in Transforming Systems / A Constraint-Based Perspective on Biological and Artificial Cognition

This paper proposes a unifying interpretation of biological and artificial cognitive systems as instances of a broader class of transforming systems. These systems exhibit directional behavior not as a consequence of intention or goal-directed agency, but as a result of structural constraints and the presence of gradients in quantities such as entropy [1] or uncertainty. Biological systems maintain internal structure by locally resisting entropy increase [1][2], while artificial systems - particularly predictive models - reduce uncertainty through probabilistic inference. Both processes can be understood as asymmetric responses to disequilibrium. We argue that this behavior reflects a more general principle: transforming systems respond to gradients in the quantities they process. This perspective provides a conceptual foundation for understanding response generation, stability, and the apparent “activity” of both natural and artificial systems without invoking teleological assumptions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20843306
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Entropy, Uncertainty, and Directionality in Transforming Systems / A Constraint-Based Perspective on Biological and Artificial Cognition

Bartosz Szlifierski
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
preprint

Entropy, Uncertainty, and Directionality in Transforming Systems / A Constraint-Based Perspective on Biological and Artificial Cognition

Bartosz Szlifierski
preprint en

Abstract

This paper proposes a unifying interpretation of biological and artificial cognitive systems as instances of a broader class of transforming systems. These systems exhibit directional behavior not as a consequence of intention or goal-directed agency, but as a result of structural constraints and the presence of gradients in quantities such as entropy [1] or uncertainty. Biological systems maintain internal structure by locally resisting entropy increase [1][2], while artificial systems - particularly predictive models - reduce uncertainty through probabilistic inference. Both processes can be understood as asymmetric responses to disequilibrium. We argue that this behavior reflects a more general principle: transforming systems respond to gradients in the quantities they process. This perspective provides a conceptual foundation for understanding response generation, stability, and the apparent “activity” of both natural and artificial systems without invoking teleological assumptions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.