STAT-C, an innovative training workshop supporting management of sick leave related to common mental health disorders: A case study for spontaneous scaling in primary care
BACKGROUND: Scaling primary care innovations to benefit broader populations is a key priority for decision-makers. While the science of effective scaling evolves, little is known about innovations that scale spontaneously, i.e., without deliberate guidance. OBJECTIVES: To assess the spontaneous scaling process of STAT-C, a training workshop supporting management of sick leave related to common mental health disorders, and its perceived effects on primary care services and beneficiaries. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods descriptive single-case study using an Integrated Knowledge Translation (iKT) approach involving patient users. The case was defined as the spontaneous scaling of STAT-C, presented at the Quebec College of Family Physicians' Innovation Symposium and assessed using a selection criteria checklist. Over one year, we observed the scaling process through monthly meetings with the innovation team and collected documents to retrace key steps. We conducted interviews with decision-makers, healthcare professionals, and end-users, along with a focus group with the innovation team. Data were analyzed thematically using documents, interviews, and meetings. The scaling process was examined using the Scaling Impact principles: justification, optimal scale, coordination, and dynamic evaluation. RESULTS: STAT-C met 71% of selection criteria. Fourteen participants were interviewed: innovation team (n = 2), healthcare professionals (n = 5), decision-makers (n = 4), and end-users (n = 3). Technical justifications included the need to standardize information across professionals (n = 10), while moral ones emphasized alignment with patient values (n = 8). Interviews revealed limited awareness of dynamic evaluation and a lack of indicators supporting further scaling. Ethical rationales reflected goal-oriented and duty-based reasoning. Preliminary data suggested improvements in healthcare professionals' self-reported competence in managing CMHD-related sick leave, offering early indications of the innovation's relevance. CONCLUSION: This study highlights strategies, challenges, and outcomes of spontaneous scaling under real-world conditions, showing how pathways emerge, strategies evolve, and ethical dimensions shape decision-making.
Authors
- Roberta de Carvalho Corôa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4778-1890)
- France Légaré (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-6696)
- Jean‐Sébastien Paquette (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-6761)
- Annie Plamondon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4864-3375)
- Cynthia Cameron
- Geneviève Roch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1695-1401)
- Diogo Mochcovitch
- Andrew Milat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3126-3463)
- Maxine Dumas Pilon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2089-7110)
- Amédé Gogovor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5988-0442)
- Marie Cimon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9841-3004)
- Robert K. D. McLean
- Ali Ben Charif
- Jeanne Champagne
Institutions
- International Development Research Centre (CA)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- College of Family Physicians of Canada (CA)
- Cégep de Lévis (CA)
- The Quebec Population Health Research Network (CA)
- Innovative Clinical Research (US)
- Effigis (Canada) (CA)
- Centres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CA)
- Université Laval (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2026-06-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0351937
- Primary Topic
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research