What it means to learn with GenAI: Theorising student teachers’ perspectives on learning with GenAI through Q methodology research

This Q study explores how student teachers conceptualize learning with GenAI and how their perspectives align with or challenge existing educational frameworks. Thirty-one student teachers sorted 44 statements derived from contemporary learning theories. The factor analysis revealed three distinct viewpoints: (1) students who view GenAI as a collaborative partner (F-1 GenAI is my sidekick), (2) those who approach it with scepticism (F-2 GenAI is here to stay … but old is gold), and (3) those who use it mainly for practical efficiency (F-3 GenAI is my shortcut to efficiency). Each factor aligned with a distinct pedagogical orientation, yet all collectively point to the inadequacy of pre-GenAI learning theories in explaining the evolving dynamics between students and agentic systems, thus highlighting the need for theoretical renewal rather than simple application or adoption. Implications are that traditional learning frameworks must be reconfigured to account for the diverse interactions between student teachers and GenAI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Teacher Education
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2026.2692989
Primary Topic
Q Methodology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What it means to learn with GenAI: Theorising student teachers’ perspectives on learning with GenAI through Q methodology research

Youmen Chaaban, Soon-Gyo Jung, Bernard J. Jim Jansen
European Journal of Teacher Education
Q Methodology Applications
article

What it means to learn with GenAI: Theorising student teachers’ perspectives on learning with GenAI through Q methodology research

Youmen Chaaban, Soon-Gyo Jung, Bernard J. Jim Jansen
article en

Abstract

This Q study explores how student teachers conceptualize learning with GenAI and how their perspectives align with or challenge existing educational frameworks. Thirty-one student teachers sorted 44 statements derived from contemporary learning theories. The factor analysis revealed three distinct viewpoints: (1) students who view GenAI as a collaborative partner (F-1 GenAI is my sidekick), (2) those who approach it with scepticism (F-2 GenAI is here to stay … but old is gold), and (3) those who use it mainly for practical efficiency (F-3 GenAI is my shortcut to efficiency). Each factor aligned with a distinct pedagogical orientation, yet all collectively point to the inadequacy of pre-GenAI learning theories in explaining the evolving dynamics between students and agentic systems, thus highlighting the need for theoretical renewal rather than simple application or adoption. Implications are that traditional learning frameworks must be reconfigured to account for the diverse interactions between student teachers and GenAI systems.

European Journal of Teacher Education
Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA), Qatar University (QA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Q Methodology Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.