UH-CAN Lung: Urine Home Collection for Lung Cancer Risk Assessment in Lung Cancer Screening Non-Responders – an observational, feasibility study protocol

<ns5:p>Early diagnosis of lung cancer leads to improved survival by detecting the disease at a more limited stage, allowing for more effective and potentially curative treatment options. The NHS England Lung Cancer Screening Programme (LCS) has significantly improved the rate of early-stage lung cancer diagnosis in those attending appointments. However, the uptake of LCS appointments varies considerably across England, averaging at 49%. Several barriers to participation were identified, including travel and fear of additional tests. The UH-CAN Lung study, developed by Cancer Research UK’s Southampton Clinical Trial Unit and funded by The Jon Moulton Charity Trust, was designed to investigate whether home collection of urine is a convenient and acceptable alternative method of exploring cancer risk for LCS non-responders. UH-CAN Lung is a non-interventional feasibility study that will post 1000 home urine collection kits to LCS non-responders. A short questionnaire with multiple-choice answers was developed and included with the kits to elicit further information about participant preferences around home sampling and reasons for LCS non-attendance. Participants will be asked to return their consent form, urine sample and questionnaire for processing and storage. At the end of the sample collection period, an aliquot of each sample is transferred to Elypta AB for quality evaluation and glycosaminoglycan profiling (GAGome), which is under investigation as a biomarker to improve the early detection of multiple cancers. Aggregate information on the number of samples returning a positive result will be returned to the study team to report alongside the sample return rate and information on whether invited participants go on to book an LCS appointment. This feasibility study will guide the design of a larger trial to generate evidence for the evaluation of both home urine collection for participant engagement and Elypta GAGome as a biomarker in the context of lung cancer screening.</ns5:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.182400.1
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UH-CAN Lung: Urine Home Collection for Lung Cancer Risk Assessment in Lung Cancer Screening Non-Responders – an observational, feasibility study protocol

Kamil Sterniczuk, Sharen Lee, Volker Liebenberg, Hannah Warming et al.
F1000Research
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

UH-CAN Lung: Urine Home Collection for Lung Cancer Risk Assessment in Lung Cancer Screening Non-Responders – an observational, feasibility study protocol

Kamil Sterniczuk, Sharen Lee, Volker Liebenberg, Hannah Warming, Victoria Goss, Richard W. Lee, Simon J. Crabb, Marianna Mirabelli, Stefanie Bonfield, Gareth Griffiths, Angelica Cazaly, Sam Wilding, Samantha Quaife, Sarah Chamberlain, Pam Smith, Thomas Oliver
article en

Abstract

<ns5:p>Early diagnosis of lung cancer leads to improved survival by detecting the disease at a more limited stage, allowing for more effective and potentially curative treatment options. The NHS England Lung Cancer Screening Programme (LCS) has significantly improved the rate of early-stage lung cancer diagnosis in those attending appointments. However, the uptake of LCS appointments varies considerably across England, averaging at 49%. Several barriers to participation were identified, including travel and fear of additional tests. The UH-CAN Lung study, developed by Cancer Research UK’s Southampton Clinical Trial Unit and funded by The Jon Moulton Charity Trust, was designed to investigate whether home collection of urine is a convenient and acceptable alternative method of exploring cancer risk for LCS non-responders. UH-CAN Lung is a non-interventional feasibility study that will post 1000 home urine collection kits to LCS non-responders. A short questionnaire with multiple-choice answers was developed and included with the kits to elicit further information about participant preferences around home sampling and reasons for LCS non-attendance. Participants will be asked to return their consent form, urine sample and questionnaire for processing and storage. At the end of the sample collection period, an aliquot of each sample is transferred to Elypta AB for quality evaluation and glycosaminoglycan profiling (GAGome), which is under investigation as a biomarker to improve the early detection of multiple cancers. Aggregate information on the number of samples returning a positive result will be returned to the study team to report alongside the sample return rate and information on whether invited participants go on to book an LCS appointment. This feasibility study will guide the design of a larger trial to generate evidence for the evaluation of both home urine collection for participant engagement and Elypta GAGome as a biomarker in the context of lung cancer screening.</ns5:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Institute of Cancer Research (CA), NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre (GB), Oncopeptides (Sweden) (SE), NIHR CRUK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
AstraZeneca, Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Jon Moulton Charity Trust
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.