In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements

Observers use smooth pursuit to track moving objects-like koi carp gliding through a pond. When positional errors accumulate, rapid catch-up saccades correct for them. Despite their abruptness, these saccades usually go unnoticed, creating the seamless experience of smooth tracking. We conducted three experiments to examine awareness and control of catch-up saccades (Experiment 1), the effect of training (Experiment 2), and of movement intention (Experiment 3). All experiments followed a similar protocol. On each trial, a target moved horizontally at one of three constant speeds (3-12 dva/s). Two horizontal stimulus bands with vertically oriented gratings appeared above and below the trajectory. These bands were rendered invisible during pursuit by rapid phase shifts (>60 Hz), but became visible when briefly stabilized on the retina-either by a catch-up saccade or its replayed retinal consequence-providing immediate, saccade-contingent visual feedback. Observers reported whether they had seen the stimulus bands (visual sensitivity) and whether they were aware of making a catch-up saccade (saccade sensitivity). Visual sensitivity was consistently higher in trials with a catch-up saccade, confirming that these movements reduce retinal motion and enhance visibility. Higher target speeds increased saccade rate, but observers struggled to control them volitionally: Visual feedback and training had no effect on the ability to control catch-up saccades. Only suppression-instructions yielded a small reduction. Saccade sensitivity was near zero, even in trials with saccade-contingent feedback. Neither training nor intention improved awareness. Together, our data suggest a limited ability to control and a low level of awareness of catch-up saccades during pursuit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.26.6.10
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements

Jan-Nikolas Klanke, Sven Ohl, Almila Naz Esen, Martin Rolfs
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements

Jan-Nikolas Klanke, Sven Ohl, Almila Naz Esen, Martin Rolfs
article en

Abstract

Observers use smooth pursuit to track moving objects-like koi carp gliding through a pond. When positional errors accumulate, rapid catch-up saccades correct for them. Despite their abruptness, these saccades usually go unnoticed, creating the seamless experience of smooth tracking. We conducted three experiments to examine awareness and control of catch-up saccades (Experiment 1), the effect of training (Experiment 2), and of movement intention (Experiment 3). All experiments followed a similar protocol. On each trial, a target moved horizontally at one of three constant speeds (3-12 dva/s). Two horizontal stimulus bands with vertically oriented gratings appeared above and below the trajectory. These bands were rendered invisible during pursuit by rapid phase shifts (>60 Hz), but became visible when briefly stabilized on the retina-either by a catch-up saccade or its replayed retinal consequence-providing immediate, saccade-contingent visual feedback. Observers reported whether they had seen the stimulus bands (visual sensitivity) and whether they were aware of making a catch-up saccade (saccade sensitivity). Visual sensitivity was consistently higher in trials with a catch-up saccade, confirming that these movements reduce retinal motion and enhance visibility. Higher target speeds increased saccade rate, but observers struggled to control them volitionally: Visual feedback and training had no effect on the ability to control catch-up saccades. Only suppression-instructions yielded a small reduction. Saccade sensitivity was near zero, even in trials with saccade-contingent feedback. Neither training nor intention improved awareness. Together, our data suggest a limited ability to control and a low level of awareness of catch-up saccades during pursuit.

Journal of VisionVol. 26(6)
Twitter (United States) (US), University of Potsdam (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (Germany) (DE), Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal (DE), Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin (DE)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.