Availability of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and hospital survival in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS)

BACKGROUND: In myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock, especially in the subgroup of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI-CS), mechanical circulatory support (MCS) might improve survival. If centers with MCS availability (MCS centers) have better outcome in STEMI-CS compared to those without MCS availability (non-MCS centers) is unknown. AIM: To analyze the association of the availability of MCS and prognosis in STEMI-CS. METHODS: Secondary analysis of the prospective "Feedback Intervention and Treatment Times in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction" (FITT-STEMI) registry comparing outcome in STEMI-CS treated in MCS and non-MCS centers. Primary endpoint was hospital mortality. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2022, a total of 5604 patients with STEMI-CS at hospital admission were included (mean age 65.3 years, rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) 86.5%, hospital mortality 44.7%). Of these, 4340/5604 (77.4%) STEMI-CS were treated in MCS centers compared to 1264/5604 (22.6%) in non-MCS centers. Patients in MCS centers were younger (65.1 versus 66.0 years, respectively, p = 0.045), were less-frequently resuscitated in-hospital (31.4% versus 35.1%, respectively, p = 0.013), and had longer contact-to-balloon times (120.7 versus 114.6 minutes, respectively, p = 0.008). Hospital mortality was 44.7% in MCS centers compared to 45.0% in non-MCS centers (OR 0.985, 95%CI 0.869-1.118, p = 0.820). Results remained consistent after adjustment for time trends and center effects (OR 0.936, 95%CI 0.804-1.091, p = 0.397) and after stratification by SCAI shock stage at presentation. After propensity score matching, again hospital mortality was similar in MCS and non-MCS centers (45.8% versus 43.7%, OR 1.070, 95%CI 0.888-1.288, p = 0.478). CONCLUSION: In this large registry of patients with STEMI-CS, hospital survival did not differ between centers with and without MCS availability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuag087
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Availability of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and hospital survival in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS)

Stefan Stefanow, Karl Heinrich Scholz, Gregor Nothofer, Klaus Hertting et al.
European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Availability of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and hospital survival in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS)

Stefan Stefanow, Karl Heinrich Scholz, Gregor Nothofer, Klaus Hertting, Tim Friede, Dawid L. Staudacher, Lorenz Bott‐Flügel, Hiller Moehlis, Julinda Mehilli, Florian Weiser, Karl Toischer, Tobias-Richard Meinel, Christian Schmidt, P Christian Schulze, Ralf Lehmann, Sebastian K G Maier, Alexander Becker
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock, especially in the subgroup of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI-CS), mechanical circulatory support (MCS) might improve survival. If centers with MCS availability (MCS centers) have better outcome in STEMI-CS compared to those without MCS availability (non-MCS centers) is unknown. AIM: To analyze the association of the availability of MCS and prognosis in STEMI-CS. METHODS: Secondary analysis of the prospective "Feedback Intervention and Treatment Times in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction" (FITT-STEMI) registry comparing outcome in STEMI-CS treated in MCS and non-MCS centers. Primary endpoint was hospital mortality. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2022, a total of 5604 patients with STEMI-CS at hospital admission were included (mean age 65.3 years, rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) 86.5%, hospital mortality 44.7%). Of these, 4340/5604 (77.4%) STEMI-CS were treated in MCS centers compared to 1264/5604 (22.6%) in non-MCS centers. Patients in MCS centers were younger (65.1 versus 66.0 years, respectively, p = 0.045), were less-frequently resuscitated in-hospital (31.4% versus 35.1%, respectively, p = 0.013), and had longer contact-to-balloon times (120.7 versus 114.6 minutes, respectively, p = 0.008). Hospital mortality was 44.7% in MCS centers compared to 45.0% in non-MCS centers (OR 0.985, 95%CI 0.869-1.118, p = 0.820). Results remained consistent after adjustment for time trends and center effects (OR 0.936, 95%CI 0.804-1.091, p = 0.397) and after stratification by SCAI shock stage at presentation. After propensity score matching, again hospital mortality was similar in MCS and non-MCS centers (45.8% versus 43.7%, OR 1.070, 95%CI 0.888-1.288, p = 0.478). CONCLUSION: In this large registry of patients with STEMI-CS, hospital survival did not differ between centers with and without MCS availability.

European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
University of Applied Sciences Landshut (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), University of Applied Management (DE), Klinikum Darmstadt (DE), Hermann-Josef-Krankenhaus Erkelenz (DE), Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken (DE), St. Bernward Krankenhaus (DE), Kliniken Maria Hilf (DE), Bionorica (Germany) (DE), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), Jena University Hospital (DE), Asklepios Klinik Langen (DE), Klinikum Ludwigsburg (DE), Klinikum Würzburg Mitte (DE), Emissions Reduzierungs Concepte (Germany) (DE), Institut für Lungenforschung (DE), University of Göttingen (DE), ESCP Business School (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.