Evaluation of Human and Viral Methylation, in Addition to Partial Genotyping, for a Molecular Triage Strategy in Women Under Active Surveillance for CIN2

Background/Objective: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) shows heterogeneous clinical behavior, with substantial rates of spontaneous regression under active surveillance. Reliable molecular biomarkers are needed to distinguish regressive from transforming lesions and reduce overtreatment. We evaluated the prognostic role of host and viral DNA methylation, alone and combined with HPV genotyping, in predicting CIN2 regression. Methods: This subanalysis derives from a prospective, multicenter Italian cohort of women with histologically confirmed CIN2 managed conservatively. Among 319 enrolled women, 134 with single HPV infections and valid host (FAM19A4/miR124-2) and viral (HPV L1 region) methylation results were included. HPV genotyping was performed with partial stratification (HPV16/18 vs. non-16/18). Clinical outcomes at 24 months were classified as regression versus persistence/progression. Logistic regression models assessed associations between biomarkers and regression. Results: At 24 months, 50% of women showed regression. Host and viral methylation positivity rates were more frequent in non-regressive lesions (40.3% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.01, and 52.2% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.02, respectively). Negative host methylation was significantly associated with regression (Odds Ratio OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17–0.81, p = 0.02), as was negative viral methylation (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.23–0.96, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Both host and viral methylation are inversely associated with CIN2 regression. Combining methylation markers did not substantially improve predictive accuracy; however, methylation negativity emerged as a potential molecular reassurance marker. When integrated with HPV genotyping, the highest probability of regression was observed among women with non-HPV16/18 infections and negative methylation results. These results endorse DNA methylation testing as a molecular tool for the conservative management of CIN2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18132067
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Human and Viral Methylation, in Addition to Partial Genotyping, for a Molecular Triage Strategy in Women Under Active Surveillance for CIN2

Marika Soldà, Cesare Romagnolo, Manuel Zorzi, Silvia Gori et al.
Cancers
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Evaluation of Human and Viral Methylation, in Addition to Partial Genotyping, for a Molecular Triage Strategy in Women Under Active Surveillance for CIN2

Marika Soldà, Cesare Romagnolo, Manuel Zorzi, Silvia Gori, Tiziano Maggino, Licia Laurino, Alessio Pagan, Annarosa Del Mistro, Enrico Busato, Giuseppe Sordi, Mario Matteucci, Helena Frayle, Egle Insacco
article en

Abstract

Background/Objective: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) shows heterogeneous clinical behavior, with substantial rates of spontaneous regression under active surveillance. Reliable molecular biomarkers are needed to distinguish regressive from transforming lesions and reduce overtreatment. We evaluated the prognostic role of host and viral DNA methylation, alone and combined with HPV genotyping, in predicting CIN2 regression. Methods: This subanalysis derives from a prospective, multicenter Italian cohort of women with histologically confirmed CIN2 managed conservatively. Among 319 enrolled women, 134 with single HPV infections and valid host (FAM19A4/miR124-2) and viral (HPV L1 region) methylation results were included. HPV genotyping was performed with partial stratification (HPV16/18 vs. non-16/18). Clinical outcomes at 24 months were classified as regression versus persistence/progression. Logistic regression models assessed associations between biomarkers and regression. Results: At 24 months, 50% of women showed regression. Host and viral methylation positivity rates were more frequent in non-regressive lesions (40.3% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.01, and 52.2% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.02, respectively). Negative host methylation was significantly associated with regression (Odds Ratio OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17–0.81, p = 0.02), as was negative viral methylation (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.23–0.96, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Both host and viral methylation are inversely associated with CIN2 regression. Combining methylation markers did not substantially improve predictive accuracy; however, methylation negativity emerged as a potential molecular reassurance marker. When integrated with HPV genotyping, the highest probability of regression was observed among women with non-HPV16/18 infections and negative methylation results. These results endorse DNA methylation testing as a molecular tool for the conservative management of CIN2.

CancersVol. 18(13)
University of Padua (IT), Ospedale di San Donà di Piave (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Regione del Veneto (IT), Ospedale dell' Angelo (IT), Ca' Foncello Hospital (IT), Azienda Ospedale - Università Padova (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico (IT)
Good health and well-being, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.