Building social harmony in difference: communication practices in Indonesia’s Eid al-Fitr determination

This practice note examines how differences in determining Eid al-Fitr between Muhammadiyah and the Indonesian government are communicated and negotiated in everyday Indonesian life. Using a reflective qualitative approach, it draws on literature-based analysis, public discourse observation, and contextual interpretation of recent incidents involving restrictions on Muhammadiyah Eid prayers. The note argues that religious difference does not automatically produce social rupture. In many communities, people continue to visit relatives, greet neighbours, and maintain social obligations even when Eid is observed on different days. These everyday gestures show how tolerance is practiced through respect, relational continuity, and mutual recognition. Yet recent restrictions also remind us that harmony is never automatic. It remains fragile, contested, and shaped by local power relations. From a communication for development perspective, the Indonesian case shows that social cohesion depends not on eliminating difference, but on the communicative capacity to negotiate it without escalating conflict.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Development in Practice
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2026.2691849
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building social harmony in difference: communication practices in Indonesia’s Eid al-Fitr determination

Pramana Pramana, Sri Hastjarjo, Monika Sri Yuliarti, Prahastiwi Utari et al.
Development in Practice
Asian Studies and History
article

Building social harmony in difference: communication practices in Indonesia’s Eid al-Fitr determination

Pramana Pramana, Sri Hastjarjo, Monika Sri Yuliarti, Prahastiwi Utari, Adi Inggit Handoko, Tri Susanto
article en

Abstract

This practice note examines how differences in determining Eid al-Fitr between Muhammadiyah and the Indonesian government are communicated and negotiated in everyday Indonesian life. Using a reflective qualitative approach, it draws on literature-based analysis, public discourse observation, and contextual interpretation of recent incidents involving restrictions on Muhammadiyah Eid prayers. The note argues that religious difference does not automatically produce social rupture. In many communities, people continue to visit relatives, greet neighbours, and maintain social obligations even when Eid is observed on different days. These everyday gestures show how tolerance is practiced through respect, relational continuity, and mutual recognition. Yet recent restrictions also remind us that harmony is never automatic. It remains fragile, contested, and shaped by local power relations. From a communication for development perspective, the Indonesian case shows that social cohesion depends not on eliminating difference, but on the communicative capacity to negotiate it without escalating conflict.

Development in Practice
Sebelas Maret University (ID), Sriwijaya University (ID), University of Singaperbangsa Karawang (ID)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Building social harmony in difference: communication practices in Indonesia’s Eid al-Fitr determination — Pramana Pramana, Sri Hastjarjo, et al. · Development in Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS