Organised breast cancer screening: the acceptability of a French decision-aid tool among women and Health professionals

Background: The decision decision-aid (lamammo lamammo-etvous.fr) was designed to support women s decision on whether or not to take part in organised breast cancer screening (DOCS) via mammography.Objectives: To assess its acceptability among women and healthcare professionals. The secondary objective was to assess its impact on women s knowledge, decision decision-making conflict and intention to participate in DOCS.Method: A cross cross-sectional survey involving a beta test of the DA, conducted in France in 2023 at three health centres. Healthcare professionals (general practitioners, midwives and gynecologists) were involved. Women were invited to take part whilst waiting in the consultation room. The questionnaire for healthcare professionals assessed the acceptability and real real-world use of the DA. The questionnaire for women assessed acceptability, level of knowledge, decision conflict (DCS DCS-10) and intention to participate in the DOCS before and after readingthe DA.Results: 18 healthcare professionals and 55 women completed the questionnaires. Acceptability was good among both women and healthcare professionals. The tool was considered useful (66.7% of healthcare professionals and 77.6% of women), clear and relevant. Reading the DA significantly increased the women s level of knowledge (10.15 vs 12.18; p < 0.001), reduced decision decision-making conflict (20.19 vs 31.70; p < 0.001), and did not alter their motivation to participate in the DOCS (9.46 vs 9.41; p = 0.742). The evaluation revealed differences in perception between women and healthcare professionals: 50% of healthcare professionals consideredthe text too long, compared with only 10.2% of women ( p < 0.001). The information was perceived as biased against the DOCS by 38.9% of healthcare professionals, compared with 2.0% of women (p < 0.001).Conclusion: This acceptability study found that reading this DA, which was well well-received by healthcare professionals and women alike, significantly increased women s level of knowledge, reduced decision decision-making conflict, and did not alter their motivation to participate in the DOCS. These findings will need to be confirmed by larger larger scale studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46298/fajpc.18620
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organised breast cancer screening: the acceptability of a French decision-aid tool among women and Health professionals

Cédric Rat, Aurélie Gaultier, Delphine Teigné, Sandrine Hild et al.
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Organised breast cancer screening: the acceptability of a French decision-aid tool among women and Health professionals

Cédric Rat, Aurélie Gaultier, Delphine Teigné, Sandrine Hild, M. Chabrat
article en

Abstract

Background: The decision decision-aid (lamammo lamammo-etvous.fr) was designed to support women s decision on whether or not to take part in organised breast cancer screening (DOCS) via mammography.Objectives: To assess its acceptability among women and healthcare professionals. The secondary objective was to assess its impact on women s knowledge, decision decision-making conflict and intention to participate in DOCS.Method: A cross cross-sectional survey involving a beta test of the DA, conducted in France in 2023 at three health centres. Healthcare professionals (general practitioners, midwives and gynecologists) were involved. Women were invited to take part whilst waiting in the consultation room. The questionnaire for healthcare professionals assessed the acceptability and real real-world use of the DA. The questionnaire for women assessed acceptability, level of knowledge, decision conflict (DCS DCS-10) and intention to participate in the DOCS before and after readingthe DA.Results: 18 healthcare professionals and 55 women completed the questionnaires. Acceptability was good among both women and healthcare professionals. The tool was considered useful (66.7% of healthcare professionals and 77.6% of women), clear and relevant. Reading the DA significantly increased the women s level of knowledge (10.15 vs 12.18; p < 0.001), reduced decision decision-making conflict (20.19 vs 31.70; p < 0.001), and did not alter their motivation to participate in the DOCS (9.46 vs 9.41; p = 0.742). The evaluation revealed differences in perception between women and healthcare professionals: 50% of healthcare professionals consideredthe text too long, compared with only 10.2% of women ( p < 0.001). The information was perceived as biased against the DOCS by 38.9% of healthcare professionals, compared with 2.0% of women (p < 0.001).Conclusion: This acceptability study found that reading this DA, which was well well-received by healthcare professionals and women alike, significantly increased women s level of knowledge, reduced decision decision-making conflict, and did not alter their motivation to participate in the DOCS. These findings will need to be confirmed by larger larger scale studies.

Primary Source (US), Nantes Université (FR)
National Cancer Institute
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.