Leadership development of university teachers in China: A mixed-methods model development and validation study

This study develops and validates a contextually grounded model of teacher leadership in Chinese higher education, addressing a gap in the literature dominated by school-based and Western-centric frameworks. Drawing on mixed methods, including grounded theory and confirmatory factor analysis, data were collected from 352 university faculty members across multiple Chinese provinces. This study employed an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design: (1) a qualitative phase (in-depth interviews) to generate context-specific dimensions and indicators of teacher leadership; and (2) a quantitative phase (survey) to test the emergent model via exploratory factor analysis/confirmatory factor analysis. The qualitative phase was conducted in October–November 2023; the quantitative survey took place from November 2023 to February 2024. The resulting four-dimensional model encompasses moral leadership, teaching leadership, research leadership, and team leadership. Findings reveal that moral and teaching leadership dominate faculty perceptions, reflecting the cultural importance of ethical conduct and pedagogical engagement in the Chinese academic tradition. Conversely, research and team leadership are less emphasized, suggesting structural constraints and potential tensions within performance-based evaluation systems. This study contributes both theoretically and methodologically by offering a replicable framework for analyzing teacher leadership in higher education and by highlighting the need for culturally responsive leadership development. Implications for faculty evaluation policies, institutional culture, and global academic leadership reform are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Management Administration & Leadership
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432261426466
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leadership development of university teachers in China: A mixed-methods model development and validation study

Haiyan Liu, Fengwen Wu
Educational Management Administration & Leadership
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Leadership development of university teachers in China: A mixed-methods model development and validation study

Haiyan Liu, Fengwen Wu
article en

Abstract

This study develops and validates a contextually grounded model of teacher leadership in Chinese higher education, addressing a gap in the literature dominated by school-based and Western-centric frameworks. Drawing on mixed methods, including grounded theory and confirmatory factor analysis, data were collected from 352 university faculty members across multiple Chinese provinces. This study employed an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design: (1) a qualitative phase (in-depth interviews) to generate context-specific dimensions and indicators of teacher leadership; and (2) a quantitative phase (survey) to test the emergent model via exploratory factor analysis/confirmatory factor analysis. The qualitative phase was conducted in October–November 2023; the quantitative survey took place from November 2023 to February 2024. The resulting four-dimensional model encompasses moral leadership, teaching leadership, research leadership, and team leadership. Findings reveal that moral and teaching leadership dominate faculty perceptions, reflecting the cultural importance of ethical conduct and pedagogical engagement in the Chinese academic tradition. Conversely, research and team leadership are less emphasized, suggesting structural constraints and potential tensions within performance-based evaluation systems. This study contributes both theoretically and methodologically by offering a replicable framework for analyzing teacher leadership in higher education and by highlighting the need for culturally responsive leadership development. Implications for faculty evaluation policies, institutional culture, and global academic leadership reform are discussed.

Educational Management Administration & Leadership
Sichuan International Studies University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.