Violent victimisation after adolescent traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a clinical prediction model using Welsh national registers

Background Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at a greater risk of subsequent violent victimisation, and a prognostic model can assist in identifying those at highest risk who can benefit from targeted interventions. We aimed to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model to estimate the risk of violent victimisation following TBI in adolescence. Methods We investigated a cohort of adolescents aged 10 to 24 exposed to TBI between 2009 and 2023, using data from a linked register, covering 86% of the population in Wales, the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank. We fitted a multivariable Cox regression model for the association between predictors and time to violent victimisation identified in medical records, with optimism-corrected bootstrapping for internal validation. Key performance measures, including discrimination and calibration, were examined at 1 and 3 years post-TBI. Results The cohort included 34 092 adolescents, of whom 332 (1.0%) were violently victimised within 1 year and 701 (2.1%) within 3 years of the TBI. The final model included a range of predictors including calendar age, sex at birth, substance misuse, psychiatric conditions, neurological conditions, conduct disorder, learning difficulties and a history of victimisation or self-harm. The clinical prediction model showed good calibration and moderate discrimination at 1 (area under the curve (AUC)=0.72) and 3 years (AUC=0.67) post-TBI. Discussion This brief, scalable and evidence-based prediction model showed moderate predictive performance at internal validation. External validation is necessary to test the model’s transportability. Conclusions A large population-based sample was used to identify risk factors for violent victimisation and develop a novel clinical prediction model for use in adolescents with TBI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Injury Prevention
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2025-046072
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Violent victimisation after adolescent traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a clinical prediction model using Welsh national registers

Maya G. T. Ogonah, Fazel Seena, Ioannis Mavroudis, Daniel Whiting
Injury Prevention
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Violent victimisation after adolescent traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a clinical prediction model using Welsh national registers

Maya G. T. Ogonah, Fazel Seena, Ioannis Mavroudis, Daniel Whiting
article en

Abstract

Background Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at a greater risk of subsequent violent victimisation, and a prognostic model can assist in identifying those at highest risk who can benefit from targeted interventions. We aimed to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model to estimate the risk of violent victimisation following TBI in adolescence. Methods We investigated a cohort of adolescents aged 10 to 24 exposed to TBI between 2009 and 2023, using data from a linked register, covering 86% of the population in Wales, the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank. We fitted a multivariable Cox regression model for the association between predictors and time to violent victimisation identified in medical records, with optimism-corrected bootstrapping for internal validation. Key performance measures, including discrimination and calibration, were examined at 1 and 3 years post-TBI. Results The cohort included 34 092 adolescents, of whom 332 (1.0%) were violently victimised within 1 year and 701 (2.1%) within 3 years of the TBI. The final model included a range of predictors including calendar age, sex at birth, substance misuse, psychiatric conditions, neurological conditions, conduct disorder, learning difficulties and a history of victimisation or self-harm. The clinical prediction model showed good calibration and moderate discrimination at 1 (area under the curve (AUC)=0.72) and 3 years (AUC=0.67) post-TBI. Discussion This brief, scalable and evidence-based prediction model showed moderate predictive performance at internal validation. External validation is necessary to test the model’s transportability. Conclusions A large population-based sample was used to identify risk factors for violent victimisation and develop a novel clinical prediction model for use in adolescents with TBI.

Injury Prevention
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Institute of Mental Health (GB), Columbia University (US)
Wellcome Trust, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.