When symptoms and resting tests disagree in interstitial lung disease: a selective role for cardiopulmonary exercise testing
<title>Extract</title> Exertional dyspnoea is nearly universal in interstitial lung disease (ILD) and remains a major driver of disability and impaired health-related quality of life [1, 2]. Yet one of the most familiar clinical conundrums in ILD is the dissociation between symptom burden and resting assessment. Despite comparable imaging and resting measures, a striking discrepancy exists in how individual patients tolerate the physiological demands of exertion and ordinary daily activity [3, 4]. This gap matters clinically: resting tests help to define disease severity and trajectory, but they do not adequately explain the physiology underlying exertional limitation.
Authors
- Jeffrey J. Swigris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2643-8110)
- Adriano R. Tonelli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2321-9545)
- Lisa Lancaster (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8465-7357)
- BATHMAPRIYA BALAKRISHNAN
- Daniel A. Culver (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7084-1329)
Institutions
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- National Jewish Health (US)
- BioMedicure (United States) (US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Respiratory Journal
- Published
- 2026-06-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00666-2026
- Primary Topic
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00