Factors that promote research literacy in university students: A systematic literature review 2015-2025

<ns5:p>This systematic literature review analyzes factors promoting research literacy among university students based on 50 studies published between 2015–2025. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were selected from Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct databases. The findings reveal research literacy as a multidimensional competency operating through three interconnected dimensions: personal (63%), pedagogical (23%), and institutional (14%). Personal factors emerged as the strongest predictors, with information literacy (d = 0.82) and research self-efficacy (d = 0.76) showing the highest effect sizes. Pedagogical factors, though less represented, demonstrated significant impact, particularly library-faculty collaboration (d = 0.94) and structured instruction (d = 0.78). Institutional factors, including frameworks and technological resources, proved essential for amplifying other variables’ effects. The review identified a paradigmatic shift from traditional information literacy toward critical artificial intelligence literacy, with a 410% growth in AI-related studies between 2023–2025. Bibliometric analysis revealed geographical concentration in Europe and Asia (50%), highlighting underrepresentation of Global South perspectives. Methodological limitations include predominance of correlational designs (36%) and scarcity of longitudinal studies (12%). The study proposes an integrative framework emphasizing the systemic nature of research literacy development, requiring coordinated interventions across personal, pedagogical, and institutional levels. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for designing comprehensive educational strategies that foster critical thinking, information evaluation, and ethical research practices in contemporary higher education contexts.</ns5:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.179559.1
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors that promote research literacy in university students: A systematic literature review 2015-2025

José Luis Núñez Pesantes, Ana Elizabeth Paredes Morales, Marilú Trinidad Flores-Lezama, Rolando Rosmer Coronado Orrillo et al.
F1000Research
Health Sciences Research and Education
article

Factors that promote research literacy in university students: A systematic literature review 2015-2025

José Luis Núñez Pesantes, Ana Elizabeth Paredes Morales, Marilú Trinidad Flores-Lezama, Rolando Rosmer Coronado Orrillo, Jacqueline Yovani Palacios Rodríguez, Carlos Alberto Barbarán Villegas
article en

Abstract

<ns5:p>This systematic literature review analyzes factors promoting research literacy among university students based on 50 studies published between 2015–2025. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were selected from Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct databases. The findings reveal research literacy as a multidimensional competency operating through three interconnected dimensions: personal (63%), pedagogical (23%), and institutional (14%). Personal factors emerged as the strongest predictors, with information literacy (d = 0.82) and research self-efficacy (d = 0.76) showing the highest effect sizes. Pedagogical factors, though less represented, demonstrated significant impact, particularly library-faculty collaboration (d = 0.94) and structured instruction (d = 0.78). Institutional factors, including frameworks and technological resources, proved essential for amplifying other variables’ effects. The review identified a paradigmatic shift from traditional information literacy toward critical artificial intelligence literacy, with a 410% growth in AI-related studies between 2023–2025. Bibliometric analysis revealed geographical concentration in Europe and Asia (50%), highlighting underrepresentation of Global South perspectives. Methodological limitations include predominance of correlational designs (36%) and scarcity of longitudinal studies (12%). The study proposes an integrative framework emphasizing the systemic nature of research literacy development, requiring coordinated interventions across personal, pedagogical, and institutional levels. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for designing comprehensive educational strategies that foster critical thinking, information evaluation, and ethical research practices in contemporary higher education contexts.</ns5:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Universidad César Vallejo (PE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Sciences Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.