Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Arabic Clinical Reasoning Scale Among Nursing Students

Background: Clinical reasoning is a vital competency for safe nursing practice, yet no validated Arabic instrument exists to assess this skill among nursing students in Saudi Arabia. Aim: This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically evaluate the Arabic version of the Clinical Reasoning Scale (CRS) and to investigate clinical reasoning among Saudi nursing students. Methods: This methodological instrument validation study with a cross-sectional survey component was conducted in Saudi Arabia between January 2024 and May 2025 among nursing students. The Arabic Clinical Reasoning Scale (CRS-A) was translated and culturally adapted in accordance with the WHOQOL Group guidelines for instrument translation. Content validity was assessed by 10 experts, and construct validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (n = 365). The response rate was 98.65%. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha (n = 365), and test–retest reliability (n = 30) was measured with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) over a two-week period. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and independent sample t-tests were also performed. Results: The tool’s content validity (S-CVI = 0.98) was confirmed by a panel of experts. The CRS-A demonstrated excellent temporal stability (ICC = 0.95, p < 0.001) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.935). The exploratory factor analysis showed that the 16 items’ factor loadings ranged from 0.542 to 0.807, and three factors accounted for 64.33% of the total variance. Students self-reported agreement with clinical reasoning abilities (mean scores: 3.81–4.18). No significant differences in clinical reasoning were found by age (p = 0.102) or gender (p = 0.226), but significant differences were found by Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The Arabic Clinical Reasoning Scale demonstrated preliminary psychometric performance for measuring clinical reasoning among Arabic-speaking student nurses. It provides educators with a valuable tool for identifying learning needs and evaluating educational interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep16070214
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Arabic Clinical Reasoning Scale Among Nursing Students

Sethuraman Nagalakshmi, Avudaiappan Seethalakshmi, Zechariah Jebakumar Arulanantham, Minimole Kalarickal Kunjan
Nursing Reports
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Arabic Clinical Reasoning Scale Among Nursing Students

Sethuraman Nagalakshmi, Avudaiappan Seethalakshmi, Zechariah Jebakumar Arulanantham, Minimole Kalarickal Kunjan
article en

Abstract

Background: Clinical reasoning is a vital competency for safe nursing practice, yet no validated Arabic instrument exists to assess this skill among nursing students in Saudi Arabia. Aim: This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically evaluate the Arabic version of the Clinical Reasoning Scale (CRS) and to investigate clinical reasoning among Saudi nursing students. Methods: This methodological instrument validation study with a cross-sectional survey component was conducted in Saudi Arabia between January 2024 and May 2025 among nursing students. The Arabic Clinical Reasoning Scale (CRS-A) was translated and culturally adapted in accordance with the WHOQOL Group guidelines for instrument translation. Content validity was assessed by 10 experts, and construct validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (n = 365). The response rate was 98.65%. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha (n = 365), and test–retest reliability (n = 30) was measured with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) over a two-week period. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and independent sample t-tests were also performed. Results: The tool’s content validity (S-CVI = 0.98) was confirmed by a panel of experts. The CRS-A demonstrated excellent temporal stability (ICC = 0.95, p < 0.001) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.935). The exploratory factor analysis showed that the 16 items’ factor loadings ranged from 0.542 to 0.807, and three factors accounted for 64.33% of the total variance. Students self-reported agreement with clinical reasoning abilities (mean scores: 3.81–4.18). No significant differences in clinical reasoning were found by age (p = 0.102) or gender (p = 0.226), but significant differences were found by Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The Arabic Clinical Reasoning Scale demonstrated preliminary psychometric performance for measuring clinical reasoning among Arabic-speaking student nurses. It provides educators with a valuable tool for identifying learning needs and evaluating educational interventions.

Nursing ReportsVol. 16(7)
Prince Sultan University (SA), Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (IN), King Fahd Military Medical Complex (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.