Factors Influencing Consultant Knee Surgeons’ Decision Making in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury Management in Athletes: An International Delphi Study

BACKGROUND: Prolonged surgical waiting lists and changing healthcare systems have raised questions about the best approach to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury management in athletes, highlighting the need for consultant knee surgeon consensus. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to establish consultant knee surgeon consensus on ACL injury management for athletes. METHODS: Twenty-two male consultant knee surgeons from the United Kingdom (UK) (n = 18), Australia (n = 2), and Canada (n = 2) completed all three rounds of a Delphi survey between April and September 2024, responding to statements developed from the existing literature and clinical expertise. RESULTS: Median responses ranged from strong agreement to strong disagreement, indicating diverse views, with narrower interquartile ranges in later rounds suggesting increasing consensus. Agreement was observed for rehabilitation‑focused approaches, patient involvement in shared decision making, and clinical factors such as knee stability and concomitant injury, while patient age and level of sport were less consistently prioritised. Disagreement persisted regarding surgical risk, including whether surgery would be required, and graft preferences (autologous versus synthetic). Some items reached full agreement (100%) or showed clustered responses (interquartile range = 0). Most items were stable between rounds (Wilcoxon: p = 0.16-1.00), although variability was observed for first-choice management, inclusion of lateral extra-articular procedures, and preferred lateral extra-articular procedure type, despite minimal median change (Wilcoxon: p = 0.02-0.09). Kendall's W indicated strong agreement in round 2 (W = 0.532, p < 0.001) and round 3 (W = 0.672, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings may support clinicians and athletes in navigating complex treatment decisions, particularly where public healthcare delays challenge conventional surgical pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports Medicine
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-026-02480-x
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Influencing Consultant Knee Surgeons’ Decision Making in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury Management in Athletes: An International Delphi Study

Cari Thorpe, Nick Dobbin, Neil Jain, Greg Young
Sports Medicine
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Factors Influencing Consultant Knee Surgeons’ Decision Making in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury Management in Athletes: An International Delphi Study

Cari Thorpe, Nick Dobbin, Neil Jain, Greg Young
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prolonged surgical waiting lists and changing healthcare systems have raised questions about the best approach to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury management in athletes, highlighting the need for consultant knee surgeon consensus. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to establish consultant knee surgeon consensus on ACL injury management for athletes. METHODS: Twenty-two male consultant knee surgeons from the United Kingdom (UK) (n = 18), Australia (n = 2), and Canada (n = 2) completed all three rounds of a Delphi survey between April and September 2024, responding to statements developed from the existing literature and clinical expertise. RESULTS: Median responses ranged from strong agreement to strong disagreement, indicating diverse views, with narrower interquartile ranges in later rounds suggesting increasing consensus. Agreement was observed for rehabilitation‑focused approaches, patient involvement in shared decision making, and clinical factors such as knee stability and concomitant injury, while patient age and level of sport were less consistently prioritised. Disagreement persisted regarding surgical risk, including whether surgery would be required, and graft preferences (autologous versus synthetic). Some items reached full agreement (100%) or showed clustered responses (interquartile range = 0). Most items were stable between rounds (Wilcoxon: p = 0.16-1.00), although variability was observed for first-choice management, inclusion of lateral extra-articular procedures, and preferred lateral extra-articular procedure type, despite minimal median change (Wilcoxon: p = 0.02-0.09). Kendall's W indicated strong agreement in round 2 (W = 0.532, p < 0.001) and round 3 (W = 0.672, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings may support clinicians and athletes in navigating complex treatment decisions, particularly where public healthcare delays challenge conventional surgical pathways.

Sports Medicine
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), WiLAN (Canada) (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.