Pilot study of feasibility, acceptability, and changes in clinical outcomes following a brief trauma-focused intervention for chronic pain

BACKGROUND: Trauma exposure is prevalent among individuals with chronic pain and is associated with poorer pain-related outcomes. Brief, scalable interventions that target overlapping trauma-pain processes are needed. This single-arm pilot study evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and changes in clinical outcomes following Stress, Trauma, and Emotional Processing for Pain (STEPP), a brief modified version of emotional awareness and expression therapy. METHODS: Adults (N=42) with mixed-etiology chronic pain and trauma exposure were enrolled. STEPP was delivered remotely over three weekly 1-hour individual sessions. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline, post-treatment, and 1-month, and 3-month follow-up. Feasibility benchmarks (≥70%) were prespecified for recruitment, treatment, and follow-up completion. Acceptability was assessed using the Treatment Helpfulness Questionnaire (THQ; -5 to 5) and Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (content credibility and expected benefit; 3-27). Linear mixed models and Hedges' g effect sizes examined changes in pain intensity (0-10) and interference with functioning (0-100), post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms (PTSD; 0-80), pain catastrophizing (concerns about pain; 0-52), and kinesiophobia (fear of movement; 17-68). RESULTS: All feasibility benchmarks were met. 93% of eligible participants enrolled, 90% of enrolled participants initiated treatment, and 97% initiators completed treatment. Among completers, follow-up completion was 100% at post-treatment and 97% at 1 and 3 months. THQ ratings were high and met benchmarks (post M=4.0±1.2; 1-month M=3.9±1.2; 3-month M=3.8±1.3). Credibility ratings met benchmarks, whereas expectancy ratings did not. Significant improvements were observed from baseline to post-treatment: pain intensity (mean change=-0.64, SE=0.23, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.18), pain interference (-3.34, SE=0.84, 95% CI -5.00 to -1.68), PTSD (-5.60, SE=1.53, 95% CI -8.64 to -2.57), pain catastrophizing (-6.69, SE=1.34, 95% CI -9.34 to -4.03), and kinesiophobia (-5.78, SE=1.21, 95% CI -8.19 to -3.37); changes were maintained through 3 months. Effect sizes were small for pain intensity and moderate-to-large for all other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: STEPP demonstrated feasibility and acceptability, with promising improvements in pain-related and trauma-related outcomes. Randomized controlled trials are needed to establish efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2026-107849
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pilot study of feasibility, acceptability, and changes in clinical outcomes following a brief trauma-focused intervention for chronic pain

Mark A. Lumley, Jolin B. Yamin, Robert Randolph Edwards, Samantha M. Meints et al.
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Pilot study of feasibility, acceptability, and changes in clinical outcomes following a brief trauma-focused intervention for chronic pain

Mark A. Lumley, Jolin B. Yamin, Robert Randolph Edwards, Samantha M. Meints, John A. Sturgeon, Jenna M. Wilson, Pamela Rist Scd, Michaela Sawada
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trauma exposure is prevalent among individuals with chronic pain and is associated with poorer pain-related outcomes. Brief, scalable interventions that target overlapping trauma-pain processes are needed. This single-arm pilot study evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and changes in clinical outcomes following Stress, Trauma, and Emotional Processing for Pain (STEPP), a brief modified version of emotional awareness and expression therapy. METHODS: Adults (N=42) with mixed-etiology chronic pain and trauma exposure were enrolled. STEPP was delivered remotely over three weekly 1-hour individual sessions. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline, post-treatment, and 1-month, and 3-month follow-up. Feasibility benchmarks (≥70%) were prespecified for recruitment, treatment, and follow-up completion. Acceptability was assessed using the Treatment Helpfulness Questionnaire (THQ; -5 to 5) and Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (content credibility and expected benefit; 3-27). Linear mixed models and Hedges' g effect sizes examined changes in pain intensity (0-10) and interference with functioning (0-100), post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms (PTSD; 0-80), pain catastrophizing (concerns about pain; 0-52), and kinesiophobia (fear of movement; 17-68). RESULTS: All feasibility benchmarks were met. 93% of eligible participants enrolled, 90% of enrolled participants initiated treatment, and 97% initiators completed treatment. Among completers, follow-up completion was 100% at post-treatment and 97% at 1 and 3 months. THQ ratings were high and met benchmarks (post M=4.0±1.2; 1-month M=3.9±1.2; 3-month M=3.8±1.3). Credibility ratings met benchmarks, whereas expectancy ratings did not. Significant improvements were observed from baseline to post-treatment: pain intensity (mean change=-0.64, SE=0.23, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.18), pain interference (-3.34, SE=0.84, 95% CI -5.00 to -1.68), PTSD (-5.60, SE=1.53, 95% CI -8.64 to -2.57), pain catastrophizing (-6.69, SE=1.34, 95% CI -9.34 to -4.03), and kinesiophobia (-5.78, SE=1.21, 95% CI -8.19 to -3.37); changes were maintained through 3 months. Effect sizes were small for pain intensity and moderate-to-large for all other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: STEPP demonstrated feasibility and acceptability, with promising improvements in pain-related and trauma-related outcomes. Randomized controlled trials are needed to establish efficacy.

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Wayne State University (US), Chestnut Hill College (US), University of Michigan (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.