Microbiome Stability in Wild and Rehabilitated Insectivorous Bats Revealed by Shotgun Metagenomics

Wildlife rehabilitation can alter host-associated microbial communities, yet the effects of temporary managed care on the gut microbiome of insectivorous bats remain poorly understood. We used shotgun metagenomic sequencing to investigate gut microbiome composition in wild and rehabilitated bats from Yorkshire, United Kingdom. A total of 25 faecal metagenomes were analysed from four bat species (Myotis daubentonii, Pipistrellus pipistrellus, Nyctalus noctula, and Nyctalus leisleri), including wild baseline individuals and bats undergoing temporary managed care for 1–49 days. Microbial community structure clustered primarily according to host species and roost location, with no significant separation associated with rehabilitation status. Among bats in managed care, bacterial alpha diversity did not differ significantly with time in care (H = 2.30, p = 0.32). Archaeal communities displayed markedly lower interindividual variation than bacterial communities (coefficient of variation: 12.2% vs. 41.8%), indicating a highly conserved archaeal microbiome across hosts. Rehabilitated bats exhibited modest compositional shifts in bacterial communities, including increased relative abundances of Yersiniaceae and Lactobacillaceae and reduced abundances of environmentally associated taxa such as Pseudomonadaceae and Erwiniaceae. These changes may reflect controlled dietary provision and reduced environmental exposure during care. Overall, no marked rehabilitation-associated differences in gut microbiome diversity or community structure were detected under the current sampling design. These findings are consistent with microbiome stability during temporary managed care, although longitudinal studies are required to confirm microbiome dynamics within individual bats. Nonetheless, this study provides an initial baseline for future microbiome-informed wildlife rehabilitation studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microorganisms
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14071403
Primary Topic
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microbiome Stability in Wild and Rehabilitated Insectivorous Bats Revealed by Shotgun Metagenomics

Alise Jany Ponsero, Andrea Telatin, David Baker, Efstathios S. Giotis et al.
Microorganisms
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
article

Microbiome Stability in Wild and Rehabilitated Insectivorous Bats Revealed by Shotgun Metagenomics

Alise Jany Ponsero, Andrea Telatin, David Baker, Efstathios S. Giotis, Dongsheng Luo, Kate Wright, Colin Townsley
article en

Abstract

Wildlife rehabilitation can alter host-associated microbial communities, yet the effects of temporary managed care on the gut microbiome of insectivorous bats remain poorly understood. We used shotgun metagenomic sequencing to investigate gut microbiome composition in wild and rehabilitated bats from Yorkshire, United Kingdom. A total of 25 faecal metagenomes were analysed from four bat species (Myotis daubentonii, Pipistrellus pipistrellus, Nyctalus noctula, and Nyctalus leisleri), including wild baseline individuals and bats undergoing temporary managed care for 1–49 days. Microbial community structure clustered primarily according to host species and roost location, with no significant separation associated with rehabilitation status. Among bats in managed care, bacterial alpha diversity did not differ significantly with time in care (H = 2.30, p = 0.32). Archaeal communities displayed markedly lower interindividual variation than bacterial communities (coefficient of variation: 12.2% vs. 41.8%), indicating a highly conserved archaeal microbiome across hosts. Rehabilitated bats exhibited modest compositional shifts in bacterial communities, including increased relative abundances of Yersiniaceae and Lactobacillaceae and reduced abundances of environmentally associated taxa such as Pseudomonadaceae and Erwiniaceae. These changes may reflect controlled dietary provision and reduced environmental exposure during care. Overall, no marked rehabilitation-associated differences in gut microbiome diversity or community structure were detected under the current sampling design. These findings are consistent with microbiome stability during temporary managed care, although longitudinal studies are required to confirm microbiome dynamics within individual bats. Nonetheless, this study provides an initial baseline for future microbiome-informed wildlife rehabilitation studies.

MicroorganismsVol. 14(7)
University of Essex (GB), University of Bradford (GB), Norwich Research Park (GB), Quadram Institute (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
University of Essex, Royal Society, Medical Research Council, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.