Reasoning and Problem-Solving in Disciplinarily Diverse Teams: Implications for Research and Practice

In light of recent technological, scientific, and medical innovations our societies have seen as an outcome of interdisciplinary teamwork, the study of reasoning within these teams has received heightened attention in the literature. Prior syntheses have been published on interdisciplinary teamwork. However, no reviews have systematically investigated reasoning and thinking as they occur in disciplinarily diverse teams. Thus, this systematic review was conducted to examine the literature addressing reasoning and thinking processes within these teams and how thinking and reasoning processes interact with problem characteristics. Forty documents were identified and synthesized, involving over 1,400 individuals engaged in interdisciplinary teamwork. The findings indicate that task characteristics, domain expertise, and the reasoning and thinking that underlie decision-making may shape how interdisciplinary teams approach and resolve problems. These insights highlight the cognitive complexity of interdisciplinary collaboration and suggest directions for future research on how reasoning processes support effective teamwork.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Educational Research
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543261448567
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reasoning and Problem-Solving in Disciplinarily Diverse Teams: Implications for Research and Practice

Patricia A. Alexander, Margaret W. Logan
Review of Educational Research
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Reasoning and Problem-Solving in Disciplinarily Diverse Teams: Implications for Research and Practice

Patricia A. Alexander, Margaret W. Logan
article en

Abstract

In light of recent technological, scientific, and medical innovations our societies have seen as an outcome of interdisciplinary teamwork, the study of reasoning within these teams has received heightened attention in the literature. Prior syntheses have been published on interdisciplinary teamwork. However, no reviews have systematically investigated reasoning and thinking as they occur in disciplinarily diverse teams. Thus, this systematic review was conducted to examine the literature addressing reasoning and thinking processes within these teams and how thinking and reasoning processes interact with problem characteristics. Forty documents were identified and synthesized, involving over 1,400 individuals engaged in interdisciplinary teamwork. The findings indicate that task characteristics, domain expertise, and the reasoning and thinking that underlie decision-making may shape how interdisciplinary teams approach and resolve problems. These insights highlight the cognitive complexity of interdisciplinary collaboration and suggest directions for future research on how reasoning processes support effective teamwork.

Review of Educational Research
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.