Cervicothoracolumbar Multiregional Spinal Stenosis (MRSS): Outcomes of Single-Stage Surgery in a Case Series of 28 Patients With a Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up

Background Multiregional spinal stenosis (MRSS), defined as concomitant stenosis involving more than two nonconsecutive anatomically distinct spinal regions, represents a complex clinical entity with variable and often overlapping neurological manifestations. The coexistence of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar canal stenosis can obscure the primary symptomatic level, pose diagnostic challenges, and increase the risk of incomplete or staged management. Failure to recognize all affected regions may result in persistent symptoms and suboptimal functional recovery. This study aimed to characterize the clinicoradiological profile of cervicothoracolumbar MRSS and to evaluate the feasibility and perioperative parameters associated with single-stage surgical decompression. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 28 consecutive patients who underwent single-stage surgical decompression for MRSS at a tertiary care center between January 2010 and March 2019, with a minimum follow-up duration of 24 months. Preoperative evaluation included a detailed neurological assessment and whole-spine MRI. Demographic characteristics, operative time (ORT), estimated blood loss (EBL), number of decompressed levels, surgical techniques employed, and intraoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results The study cohort comprised 28 patients (16 males and 12 females) with a mean age of 53.8 ± 9.6 years (range: 38-74 years). The mean ORT was 171.28 ± 48.13 minutes, and the mean EBL was 394.71 ± 131.14 mL. A total of 344 spinal levels were decompressed (mean: 12.28 levels per patient), involving the cervical (n = 123), thoracic (n = 151), and lumbar (n = 70) regions. Surgical procedures included anterior cervical decompression (n = 3), thoracic posterior instrumentation with pedicle screw fixation (n = 4), thoracic interbody fusion (n = 2), laminectomy (n = 9), and lumbar interbody fusion (n = 10). No major intraoperative complications were encountered. Conclusions MRSS should be strongly suspected in patients presenting with discordant, noncontiguous, or disproportionately severe neurological findings. Whole-spine MRI plays a pivotal role in identifying multiregional involvement and guiding comprehensive surgical planning. Single-stage decompression appears to be a safe and feasible strategy in carefully selected patients, demonstrating acceptable perioperative parameters.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.111492
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cervicothoracolumbar Multiregional Spinal Stenosis (MRSS): Outcomes of Single-Stage Surgery in a Case Series of 28 Patients With a Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up

Sandesh Subhash Agrawal, Mikeson Panthackel, Rushikesh Bhanudas Shahade, Kishan Panjwani et al.
Cureus
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Cervicothoracolumbar Multiregional Spinal Stenosis (MRSS): Outcomes of Single-Stage Surgery in a Case Series of 28 Patients With a Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up

Sandesh Subhash Agrawal, Mikeson Panthackel, Rushikesh Bhanudas Shahade, Kishan Panjwani, Bharatkumar R Dave, Mirant B Dave, Yogenkumar Adodariya, Shivanand C Mayi, Ajay Krishnan, Saurabh S Kulkarni, Arjit Vashishtha, Ravi Ranjan Rai
article en

Abstract

Background Multiregional spinal stenosis (MRSS), defined as concomitant stenosis involving more than two nonconsecutive anatomically distinct spinal regions, represents a complex clinical entity with variable and often overlapping neurological manifestations. The coexistence of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar canal stenosis can obscure the primary symptomatic level, pose diagnostic challenges, and increase the risk of incomplete or staged management. Failure to recognize all affected regions may result in persistent symptoms and suboptimal functional recovery. This study aimed to characterize the clinicoradiological profile of cervicothoracolumbar MRSS and to evaluate the feasibility and perioperative parameters associated with single-stage surgical decompression. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 28 consecutive patients who underwent single-stage surgical decompression for MRSS at a tertiary care center between January 2010 and March 2019, with a minimum follow-up duration of 24 months. Preoperative evaluation included a detailed neurological assessment and whole-spine MRI. Demographic characteristics, operative time (ORT), estimated blood loss (EBL), number of decompressed levels, surgical techniques employed, and intraoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results The study cohort comprised 28 patients (16 males and 12 females) with a mean age of 53.8 ± 9.6 years (range: 38-74 years). The mean ORT was 171.28 ± 48.13 minutes, and the mean EBL was 394.71 ± 131.14 mL. A total of 344 spinal levels were decompressed (mean: 12.28 levels per patient), involving the cervical (n = 123), thoracic (n = 151), and lumbar (n = 70) regions. Surgical procedures included anterior cervical decompression (n = 3), thoracic posterior instrumentation with pedicle screw fixation (n = 4), thoracic interbody fusion (n = 2), laminectomy (n = 9), and lumbar interbody fusion (n = 10). No major intraoperative complications were encountered. Conclusions MRSS should be strongly suspected in patients presenting with discordant, noncontiguous, or disproportionately severe neurological findings. Whole-spine MRI plays a pivotal role in identifying multiregional involvement and guiding comprehensive surgical planning. Single-stage decompression appears to be a safe and feasible strategy in carefully selected patients, demonstrating acceptable perioperative parameters.

Cureus
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.