The association between daily real-time assessment of subjective cognitive function and objective cognition using ecological momentary assessment.

Objective: Subjective cognitive decline is a known risk factor for dementia, but associations between subjective and objective cognition have been inconsistently reported.This may, in part, be due to methods of assessment.This study used ecological momentary assessment to examine real-time associations between subjective mental sharpness and objective cognitive performance.Method: The sample included 162 older adults (M age = 71.78,SD = 5.01) enrolled in a clinical trial promoting memory strategies and healthy lifestyles.Participants endorsed concern about recent cognitive changes but performed within normal limits on cognitive screening.Using smartwatches, participants received four daily prompts to rate their mental sharpness (1-5 Likert scale), followed by an n-back task.Positive and negative affect were assessed daily.Bayesian mixed effects modeling quantified the strength of association between n-back performance and both average and momentary (deviations from one's own average) deviations in self-rated sharpness controlling for mood/affect, contextual factors, and practice effects.A secondary analysis investigated whether variability in performance was associated with any of the predictor variables.Results: There was an independent association between momentary deviations in mental sharpness on n-back performance (b = 0.041, 95% CI [0.008, 0.074]) such that when a participant's self-rated sharpness was below their personal average, cognitive performance was lower.Performance variability increased with age but was not strongly associated with self-reported sharpness.Conclusions: Ecological momentary assessment-captured momentary deviations in perceived sharpness predicted objective cognitive performance.Findings suggest that ecological momentary assessment methods could advance our ability to measure subjective cognitive ratings, with implications for detecting individuals at risk for developing dementia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuropsychology
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0001075
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The association between daily real-time assessment of subjective cognitive function and objective cognition using ecological momentary assessment.

Brandon E. Gavett, Diane Cook, Shenghai Dai, Catherine Luna et al.
Neuropsychology
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

The association between daily real-time assessment of subjective cognitive function and objective cognition using ecological momentary assessment.

Brandon E. Gavett, Diane Cook, Shenghai Dai, Catherine Luna, Jaclyn M. Fox, Sarah Farias, Matthew J. Zawadzki, Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe, Alyssa M. Weakley
article en

Abstract

Objective: Subjective cognitive decline is a known risk factor for dementia, but associations between subjective and objective cognition have been inconsistently reported.This may, in part, be due to methods of assessment.This study used ecological momentary assessment to examine real-time associations between subjective mental sharpness and objective cognitive performance.Method: The sample included 162 older adults (M age = 71.78,SD = 5.01) enrolled in a clinical trial promoting memory strategies and healthy lifestyles.Participants endorsed concern about recent cognitive changes but performed within normal limits on cognitive screening.Using smartwatches, participants received four daily prompts to rate their mental sharpness (1-5 Likert scale), followed by an n-back task.Positive and negative affect were assessed daily.Bayesian mixed effects modeling quantified the strength of association between n-back performance and both average and momentary (deviations from one's own average) deviations in self-rated sharpness controlling for mood/affect, contextual factors, and practice effects.A secondary analysis investigated whether variability in performance was associated with any of the predictor variables.Results: There was an independent association between momentary deviations in mental sharpness on n-back performance (b = 0.041, 95% CI [0.008, 0.074]) such that when a participant's self-rated sharpness was below their personal average, cognitive performance was lower.Performance variability increased with age but was not strongly associated with self-reported sharpness.Conclusions: Ecological momentary assessment-captured momentary deviations in perceived sharpness predicted objective cognitive performance.Findings suggest that ecological momentary assessment methods could advance our ability to measure subjective cognitive ratings, with implications for detecting individuals at risk for developing dementia.

Neuropsychology
University of California, Merced (US), Washington State University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.