Exploration of obstetric violence against women: an application of discourse analysis in the case of Vietnam

This article explores the phenomenon of obstetric violence against women in Vietnam through the lens of feminist legal theory, combining critical legal analysis with discourse analysis of digital narratives. Although obstetric violence has gained international recognition, it remains largely unacknowledged in Vietnam’s legal and medical frameworks. To address this gap, the authors analyze online reviews and testimonies from pregnant women and their families, particularly those concerning experiences at major public maternity hospitals, to uncover recurring patterns that constrain women’s autonomy. Examined through the framework of feminist legal theory, these narratives expose systemic flaws in medical practices that fail to respect and protect Vietnamese women’s reproductive rights. The findings lay the groundwork for future empirical research and legal reform, advocating for the formal recognition of the term obstetric violence and its prohibition within Vietnam’s reproductive healthcare regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Griffith Law Review
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2026.2688668
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploration of obstetric violence against women: an application of discourse analysis in the case of Vietnam

Dinh Duc Nguyen, Linh Cam Thi Le, Tien Thi My Chau
Griffith Law Review
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Exploration of obstetric violence against women: an application of discourse analysis in the case of Vietnam

Dinh Duc Nguyen, Linh Cam Thi Le, Tien Thi My Chau
article en

Abstract

This article explores the phenomenon of obstetric violence against women in Vietnam through the lens of feminist legal theory, combining critical legal analysis with discourse analysis of digital narratives. Although obstetric violence has gained international recognition, it remains largely unacknowledged in Vietnam’s legal and medical frameworks. To address this gap, the authors analyze online reviews and testimonies from pregnant women and their families, particularly those concerning experiences at major public maternity hospitals, to uncover recurring patterns that constrain women’s autonomy. Examined through the framework of feminist legal theory, these narratives expose systemic flaws in medical practices that fail to respect and protect Vietnamese women’s reproductive rights. The findings lay the groundwork for future empirical research and legal reform, advocating for the formal recognition of the term obstetric violence and its prohibition within Vietnam’s reproductive healthcare regulations.

Griffith Law Review
City University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Economics and Law
Đại học Kinh tế Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.