Depth and Procedure Specific Effects of Antimicrobial Versus Conventional Sutures on Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common postoperative complications that delay wound healing and increase morbidity and healthcare costs. Conventional sutures lack antimicrobial properties and may act as a nidus for infection. Antimicrobial-coated sutures have been proposed to reduce SSI rates. This systematic review synthesizes literature comparing traditional and antimicrobial sutures regarding SSIs and wound healing to inform clinical guidelines and future research. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and VHL were searched on March 25, 2025, using terms related to antimicrobial sutures, traditional sutures, and surgical site infection. Two independent reviewers screened studies by title and abstract, followed by full-text review using predefined eligibility criteria. Included studies were original investigations in English involving live human subjects. RESULTS: Included studies primarily evaluated absorbable sutures, most commonly polyglactin 910 and polydioxanone, with antimicrobial variants incorporating triclosan or chlorhexidine. Antimicrobial sutures did not significantly reduce superficial SSI (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69-1.24, p = 0.59) but were associated with a 36% reduction in deep SSI (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.93, p = 0.02). Significant reductions were observed in abdominal (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.97, p = 0.04) and colorectal procedures (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.80, p = 0.0004), but not in vascular or cardiothoracic surgery. In procedures demonstrating significant benefit, the incremental cost of antimicrobial sutures was lower than the estimated cost of treating SSI. CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial sutures reduce deep, but not superficial, SSIs, with most benefit in abdominal and colorectal procedures. This supports selective, risk-stratified implementation of antimicrobial sutures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70805
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Depth and Procedure Specific Effects of Antimicrobial Versus Conventional Sutures on Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Marc D. Basson, Ahmed Adham R. Elsayed, Ryan Muakkassa, Andrew Roach
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Depth and Procedure Specific Effects of Antimicrobial Versus Conventional Sutures on Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Marc D. Basson, Ahmed Adham R. Elsayed, Ryan Muakkassa, Andrew Roach
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common postoperative complications that delay wound healing and increase morbidity and healthcare costs. Conventional sutures lack antimicrobial properties and may act as a nidus for infection. Antimicrobial-coated sutures have been proposed to reduce SSI rates. This systematic review synthesizes literature comparing traditional and antimicrobial sutures regarding SSIs and wound healing to inform clinical guidelines and future research. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and VHL were searched on March 25, 2025, using terms related to antimicrobial sutures, traditional sutures, and surgical site infection. Two independent reviewers screened studies by title and abstract, followed by full-text review using predefined eligibility criteria. Included studies were original investigations in English involving live human subjects. RESULTS: Included studies primarily evaluated absorbable sutures, most commonly polyglactin 910 and polydioxanone, with antimicrobial variants incorporating triclosan or chlorhexidine. Antimicrobial sutures did not significantly reduce superficial SSI (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69-1.24, p = 0.59) but were associated with a 36% reduction in deep SSI (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.93, p = 0.02). Significant reductions were observed in abdominal (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.97, p = 0.04) and colorectal procedures (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.80, p = 0.0004), but not in vascular or cardiothoracic surgery. In procedures demonstrating significant benefit, the incremental cost of antimicrobial sutures was lower than the estimated cost of treating SSI. CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial sutures reduce deep, but not superficial, SSIs, with most benefit in abdominal and colorectal procedures. This supports selective, risk-stratified implementation of antimicrobial sutures.

ANZ Journal of Surgery
Northeast Ohio Medical University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.