Patient-reported distress and correlates while on adjuvant endocrine therapy following breast cancer treatment among post-menopausal women: a group-based trajectory model analysis

PURPOSE: To examine changes in patient-reported distress in female breast cancer (hormone-receptor-positive, stages 1-3) patients aged 55 + taking adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). METHODS: A retrospective cohort was constructed using the electronic health record (EHR) at a single Midwestern site from 2014 to 2019. Patients (N = 390) were included if they had completed two or more distress thermometer (DT) assessments. The DT is scored from 0 to 10; four is the threshold for clinically concerning distress. Trajectories were assigned using group-based trajectory modeling analyses. Predictors of group membership were identified using a cross-validated lasso algorithm. RESULTS: The best-fit model included four groups. Group 1 (22%) had no distress, Group 2 (29%) had low distress (average DT = 0.8) that remained low, Group 3 (33%) had medium-low distress (2.7) that remained low, and Group 4 (16%) had high distress (6.2) that decreased but remained high (5) over time. Higher initial DT value was associated with a decreased odds of membership in Group 1 (OR = 0.88; 95% CI (0.80-0.95)) and increased in Group 4 (OR = 1.14; 95% CI (1.06-1.25)). Endorsement of sleep issues was associated with decreased odds of membership in Group 1 (OR = 0.59; 95% CI (0.40-0.87)) and increased odds of membership in Group 3 (OR = 1.53; 95% CI (1.11-2.26)). CONCLUSION: The majority of post-menopausal women do not report distress while taking AET; however, one in six reports high distress that did not dissipate with time. This work adds to the understanding of distress in breast cancer survivors and supports the use of the DT in providing actionable information on distress and its causes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10915-4
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-reported distress and correlates while on adjuvant endocrine therapy following breast cancer treatment among post-menopausal women: a group-based trajectory model analysis

Kara L. Gavin, Kathryn E. Flynn, Joan Neuner, Aaron N. Winn et al.
Supportive Care in Cancer
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Patient-reported distress and correlates while on adjuvant endocrine therapy following breast cancer treatment among post-menopausal women: a group-based trajectory model analysis

Kara L. Gavin, Kathryn E. Flynn, Joan Neuner, Aaron N. Winn, Vaia Makris, Jacob Tiegs
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine changes in patient-reported distress in female breast cancer (hormone-receptor-positive, stages 1-3) patients aged 55 + taking adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). METHODS: A retrospective cohort was constructed using the electronic health record (EHR) at a single Midwestern site from 2014 to 2019. Patients (N = 390) were included if they had completed two or more distress thermometer (DT) assessments. The DT is scored from 0 to 10; four is the threshold for clinically concerning distress. Trajectories were assigned using group-based trajectory modeling analyses. Predictors of group membership were identified using a cross-validated lasso algorithm. RESULTS: The best-fit model included four groups. Group 1 (22%) had no distress, Group 2 (29%) had low distress (average DT = 0.8) that remained low, Group 3 (33%) had medium-low distress (2.7) that remained low, and Group 4 (16%) had high distress (6.2) that decreased but remained high (5) over time. Higher initial DT value was associated with a decreased odds of membership in Group 1 (OR = 0.88; 95% CI (0.80-0.95)) and increased in Group 4 (OR = 1.14; 95% CI (1.06-1.25)). Endorsement of sleep issues was associated with decreased odds of membership in Group 1 (OR = 0.59; 95% CI (0.40-0.87)) and increased odds of membership in Group 3 (OR = 1.53; 95% CI (1.11-2.26)). CONCLUSION: The majority of post-menopausal women do not report distress while taking AET; however, one in six reports high distress that did not dissipate with time. This work adds to the understanding of distress in breast cancer survivors and supports the use of the DT in providing actionable information on distress and its causes.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(7)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.