A clinical-radiomic model based on best subset regression for prognostic prediction in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma

The outcomes of patients with natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) are heterogeneous, thus, this study aimed to develop and validate prognostic models for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NKTCL by integrating clinicopathological and pre-treatment [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]-FDG PET/CT)-derived variables, comparing the performance of univariate COX, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and best subset regression (BSR) methods. This retrospective study analyzed a cohort of 114 pre-treatment patients with NKTCL who have performed [18F]-FDG PET/CT scan. Predictors included clinical parameters (e.g., age, albumin (Alb)), pathological indices (e.g., Ki67), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and imaging metrics (e.g., radiomics score (Radscore), maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ), lumbar-to-liver SUV mean ratio (LLR), and spleen-to-liver SUV mean ratio (SLR)). Variable selection was performed using univariate COX ( P < 0.1), LASSO, and BSR techniques. The resulting models were compared using the area under the curve (AUC) and concordance index (C-index), with internal validation via bootstrapping. The BSR-derived model demonstrated superior performance for predicting OS (3-year AUC: 0.883; C-index: 0.807). For OS, the optimal multivariate model identified Alb (hazard ratios (HR): 0.226, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.073–0.697, P = 0.00961), EBV (HR: 3.826, 95% CI: 1.259–11.630, P = 0.017986), SUV max (HR: 2.466, 95% CI: 1.123–5.416, P = 0.024517), LLR (HR: 0.195, 95% CI: 0.077–0.493, P = 0.000549), and Radscore (HR: 15.463, 95% CI: 5.313–45.001, P = 5.05e-07) as independent prognostic factors. For PFS, the optimal model comprised age (HR: 2.292, 95% CI: 1.076–4.884, P = 0.03166), EBV (HR: 4.168, 95% CI: 1.588–10.936, P = 0.00373), and Ki67 (HR: 2.608, 95% CI: 1.221–5.572, P = 0.01334). Comparative analysis revealed that BSR outperformed both univariate COX regression and LASSO in selecting variables for NKTCL prognosis modeling. Using BSR, we developed a robust model integrating essential clinical factors and PET/CT-derived radiomic features (e.g., Alb, EBV, SUVmax, LLR and Radscore for OS and age, EBV and Ki67 for PFS), offering a valuable tool for risk stratification and guiding individualized treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Imaging
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-026-01074-0
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A clinical-radiomic model based on best subset regression for prognostic prediction in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma

Longlan Chen, Fangfang Tian, Hua Pang, X L Chen
Cancer Imaging
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

A clinical-radiomic model based on best subset regression for prognostic prediction in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma

Longlan Chen, Fangfang Tian, Hua Pang, X L Chen
article en

Abstract

The outcomes of patients with natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) are heterogeneous, thus, this study aimed to develop and validate prognostic models for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NKTCL by integrating clinicopathological and pre-treatment [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]-FDG PET/CT)-derived variables, comparing the performance of univariate COX, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and best subset regression (BSR) methods. This retrospective study analyzed a cohort of 114 pre-treatment patients with NKTCL who have performed [18F]-FDG PET/CT scan. Predictors included clinical parameters (e.g., age, albumin (Alb)), pathological indices (e.g., Ki67), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and imaging metrics (e.g., radiomics score (Radscore), maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ), lumbar-to-liver SUV mean ratio (LLR), and spleen-to-liver SUV mean ratio (SLR)). Variable selection was performed using univariate COX ( P < 0.1), LASSO, and BSR techniques. The resulting models were compared using the area under the curve (AUC) and concordance index (C-index), with internal validation via bootstrapping. The BSR-derived model demonstrated superior performance for predicting OS (3-year AUC: 0.883; C-index: 0.807). For OS, the optimal multivariate model identified Alb (hazard ratios (HR): 0.226, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.073–0.697, P = 0.00961), EBV (HR: 3.826, 95% CI: 1.259–11.630, P = 0.017986), SUV max (HR: 2.466, 95% CI: 1.123–5.416, P = 0.024517), LLR (HR: 0.195, 95% CI: 0.077–0.493, P = 0.000549), and Radscore (HR: 15.463, 95% CI: 5.313–45.001, P = 5.05e-07) as independent prognostic factors. For PFS, the optimal model comprised age (HR: 2.292, 95% CI: 1.076–4.884, P = 0.03166), EBV (HR: 4.168, 95% CI: 1.588–10.936, P = 0.00373), and Ki67 (HR: 2.608, 95% CI: 1.221–5.572, P = 0.01334). Comparative analysis revealed that BSR outperformed both univariate COX regression and LASSO in selecting variables for NKTCL prognosis modeling. Using BSR, we developed a robust model integrating essential clinical factors and PET/CT-derived radiomic features (e.g., Alb, EBV, SUVmax, LLR and Radscore for OS and age, EBV and Ki67 for PFS), offering a valuable tool for risk stratification and guiding individualized treatment strategies.

Cancer Imaging
Chongqing University (CN), The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Cancer Hospital (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.