Prenatal Genetic Testing for Beckwith‐Wiedemann Syndrome: Considerations, Challenges and Observations (A Real‐World Study)

OBJECTIVE: Prenatal genetic testing for imprinting disorders is rarely requested with the exception of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) which is associated with specific ultrasound findings (e.g., placental mesenchymal dysplasia, omphalocele). However, genetic testing for BWS is challenging as aberrant DNA methylation has to be addressed which often occur as mosaicism. As a growing number of requests for prenatal BWS testing is observed, data from genetic prenatal BWS testing was compiled to delineate its suitability as well as limitations. METHOD: Three European laboratories compiled the experiences from 646 prenatal samples. The samples were analysed by methylation-specific assays targeting the imprinting centres in 11p15.5, in a sub-cohort CDKN1C was sequenced. RESULTS: The overall detection rate for BWS specific molecular disturbances was 9.75%, and the spectrum of alterations reflected that from postnatal BWS cohorts. The rate of failing samples was in total 4.3%, nearly all failures were observed in native samples. CONCLUSION: Prenatal testing for BWS should be considered in pregnancies with ultrasound findings or family history suggestive for BWS. In the majority of tests, evaluable results can be achieved, though mosaicism can never be excluded and therefore false-negative results are possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prenatal Diagnosis
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70206
Primary Topic
Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prenatal Genetic Testing for Beckwith‐Wiedemann Syndrome: Considerations, Challenges and Observations (A Real‐World Study)

Melissa Connolly, Katja Eggermann, Thomas Eggermann, Annette Lischka et al.
Prenatal Diagnosis
Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
article

Prenatal Genetic Testing for Beckwith‐Wiedemann Syndrome: Considerations, Challenges and Observations (A Real‐World Study)

Melissa Connolly, Katja Eggermann, Thomas Eggermann, Annette Lischka, Matthias Begemann, Pierpaola Tannorella, Tanja Richter, Ester Mainini, Silvia Russo, Andreas Dufke, L McClelland
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prenatal genetic testing for imprinting disorders is rarely requested with the exception of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) which is associated with specific ultrasound findings (e.g., placental mesenchymal dysplasia, omphalocele). However, genetic testing for BWS is challenging as aberrant DNA methylation has to be addressed which often occur as mosaicism. As a growing number of requests for prenatal BWS testing is observed, data from genetic prenatal BWS testing was compiled to delineate its suitability as well as limitations. METHOD: Three European laboratories compiled the experiences from 646 prenatal samples. The samples were analysed by methylation-specific assays targeting the imprinting centres in 11p15.5, in a sub-cohort CDKN1C was sequenced. RESULTS: The overall detection rate for BWS specific molecular disturbances was 9.75%, and the spectrum of alterations reflected that from postnatal BWS cohorts. The rate of failing samples was in total 4.3%, nearly all failures were observed in native samples. CONCLUSION: Prenatal testing for BWS should be considered in pregnancies with ultrasound findings or family history suggestive for BWS. In the majority of tests, evaluable results can be achieved, though mosaicism can never be excluded and therefore false-negative results are possible.

Prenatal Diagnosis
Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Genetikum (DE), West Midlands Police (GB), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT), University of Tübingen (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.