Feasibility and user evaluation of HopeBot: An LLM-powered conversational chatbot for depression screening

Clinician-administered Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) interviews allow clarification of ambiguous responses but are resource-intensive and difficult to scale for routine use. Self-administered versions are widely adopted for depression screening yet offer little opportunity for interaction or clarification, which may limit engagement and scoring accuracy. We developed HopeBot, a conversational chatbot powered by a large language model (LLM) that delivers the PHQ-9 via text or voice, providing real-time clarification and safety guidance through a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) layer drawing on validated psychological and helpline resources. The system aims to extend access to structured screening rather than replace clinician judgment. In a within-subject feasibility study, 132 adults from two countries completed both self-administered and chatbot-assisted PHQ-9 assessments followed by a 25-item evaluation survey. Chatbot and self-report scores showed high concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92; median absolute difference = 1 point), indicating faithful replication of scoring. Of these participants, 75 completed a comparative feedback module (most with identical scores were not prompted for comparison); 71% (n = 53) reported greater confidence in chatbot-assisted scores, citing clearer structure, interpretive guidance, and a supportive tone. Mean usability ratings (0-10) were 8.4 for comfort, 7.7 for voice clarity, 7.6 for handling sensitive topics, and 7.4 for recommendation helpfulness; the latter varied significantly by employment status and prior experience with mental-health services. The self-administered PHQ-9 served as a pragmatic comparator reflecting real-world digital screening, allowing evaluation of whether the chatbot could faithfully reproduce the questionnaire's structure and scoring accuracy rather than diagnostic validity. These findings indicate that an LLM-powered conversational agent with RAG-based grounding can feasibly and acceptably administer the PHQ-9 with strong score concordance relative to self-report, suggesting potential as a scalable adjunct for early, low-burden depression screening. Further validation against clinician-administered assessments in real-world workflows is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06801925.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001446
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and user evaluation of HopeBot: An LLM-powered conversational chatbot for depression screening

Julia Ive, Zhijun Guo, Kezhi Li, Johan H. Thygesen et al.
PLOS Digital Health
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Feasibility and user evaluation of HopeBot: An LLM-powered conversational chatbot for depression screening

Julia Ive, Zhijun Guo, Kezhi Li, Johan H. Thygesen, Yutong Wang, Alvina Lai, Alexandru Petcu, Luyuan Qi
article en

Abstract

Clinician-administered Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) interviews allow clarification of ambiguous responses but are resource-intensive and difficult to scale for routine use. Self-administered versions are widely adopted for depression screening yet offer little opportunity for interaction or clarification, which may limit engagement and scoring accuracy. We developed HopeBot, a conversational chatbot powered by a large language model (LLM) that delivers the PHQ-9 via text or voice, providing real-time clarification and safety guidance through a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) layer drawing on validated psychological and helpline resources. The system aims to extend access to structured screening rather than replace clinician judgment. In a within-subject feasibility study, 132 adults from two countries completed both self-administered and chatbot-assisted PHQ-9 assessments followed by a 25-item evaluation survey. Chatbot and self-report scores showed high concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92; median absolute difference = 1 point), indicating faithful replication of scoring. Of these participants, 75 completed a comparative feedback module (most with identical scores were not prompted for comparison); 71% (n = 53) reported greater confidence in chatbot-assisted scores, citing clearer structure, interpretive guidance, and a supportive tone. Mean usability ratings (0-10) were 8.4 for comfort, 7.7 for voice clarity, 7.6 for handling sensitive topics, and 7.4 for recommendation helpfulness; the latter varied significantly by employment status and prior experience with mental-health services. The self-administered PHQ-9 served as a pragmatic comparator reflecting real-world digital screening, allowing evaluation of whether the chatbot could faithfully reproduce the questionnaire's structure and scoring accuracy rather than diagnostic validity. These findings indicate that an LLM-powered conversational agent with RAG-based grounding can feasibly and acceptably administer the PHQ-9 with strong score concordance relative to self-report, suggesting potential as a scalable adjunct for early, low-burden depression screening. Further validation against clinician-administered assessments in real-world workflows is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06801925.

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 5(6)
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Farr Institute (GB), Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.