Strain Echocardiography in MINOCA: Diagnostic and Follow-Up Implications

Background/Objectives: Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) represents a heterogeneous clinical entity in which patients exhibit symptoms and biomarker evidence of myocardial infarction despite the absence of significant coronary stenosis. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and follow-up value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) in patients with MINOCA and to investigate its association with inflammatory and glycemic biomarkers. Methods: A total of 287 patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome were prospectively enrolled. Based on coronary angiographic findings, patients were classified into two groups: myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary arteries (MIOCA; ≥50% stenosis, n = 237) and MINOCA (<50% stenosis, n = 50). In addition, an ischemic control group without obstructive disease (INOCA, n = 50) was included for comparative analysis. Laboratory tests, echocardiography, and LV-GLS were assessed at baseline and at 3 months. Results: Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV-GLS were significantly lower in MIOCA compared with MINOCA (LVEF: 52.9 ± 10.3% vs. 59.7 ± 8.7%, p < 0.001; LV-GLS: −11.46 ± 4.84% vs. −12.63 ± 6.33%, p = 0.007, respectively). At 3 months, LVEF remained lower in the MIOCA group (57.5 ± 6.6% vs. 62.0 ± 7.9%; p < 0.001, respectively), whereas LV-GLS improved similarly in both groups with no significant difference (−15.27 ± 2.60% vs. −14.87 ± 5.21%; p = 0.29, respectively). Among MINOCA patients, the neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR) (p = 0.017) and admission glucose (p = 0.047) were independently associated with impaired LV-GLS (defined as values greater than −16%). Conclusions: Although LVEF remained higher in MINOCA patients during follow-up, LV-GLS impairment persisted at levels comparable to those observed in MIOCA, suggesting ongoing subclinical myocardial dysfunction. LV-GLS offers superior diagnostic sensitivity to LVEF. Inflammatory and glycemic markers may aid in early risk stratification and guide management in patients with MINOCA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15134934
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strain Echocardiography in MINOCA: Diagnostic and Follow-Up Implications

Samim Emet, Fehmi Mercanoğlu, Ali Elitok, Pelin Karaca Özer et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Strain Echocardiography in MINOCA: Diagnostic and Follow-Up Implications

Samim Emet, Fehmi Mercanoğlu, Ali Elitok, Pelin Karaca Özer, Elif Ayduk Gövdeli, Mehmet Aydoğan, Mustafa Lütfi Yavuz, Mehmet Akif Parlar
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) represents a heterogeneous clinical entity in which patients exhibit symptoms and biomarker evidence of myocardial infarction despite the absence of significant coronary stenosis. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and follow-up value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) in patients with MINOCA and to investigate its association with inflammatory and glycemic biomarkers. Methods: A total of 287 patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome were prospectively enrolled. Based on coronary angiographic findings, patients were classified into two groups: myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary arteries (MIOCA; ≥50% stenosis, n = 237) and MINOCA (<50% stenosis, n = 50). In addition, an ischemic control group without obstructive disease (INOCA, n = 50) was included for comparative analysis. Laboratory tests, echocardiography, and LV-GLS were assessed at baseline and at 3 months. Results: Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV-GLS were significantly lower in MIOCA compared with MINOCA (LVEF: 52.9 ± 10.3% vs. 59.7 ± 8.7%, p < 0.001; LV-GLS: −11.46 ± 4.84% vs. −12.63 ± 6.33%, p = 0.007, respectively). At 3 months, LVEF remained lower in the MIOCA group (57.5 ± 6.6% vs. 62.0 ± 7.9%; p < 0.001, respectively), whereas LV-GLS improved similarly in both groups with no significant difference (−15.27 ± 2.60% vs. −14.87 ± 5.21%; p = 0.29, respectively). Among MINOCA patients, the neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR) (p = 0.017) and admission glucose (p = 0.047) were independently associated with impaired LV-GLS (defined as values greater than −16%). Conclusions: Although LVEF remained higher in MINOCA patients during follow-up, LV-GLS impairment persisted at levels comparable to those observed in MIOCA, suggesting ongoing subclinical myocardial dysfunction. LV-GLS offers superior diagnostic sensitivity to LVEF. Inflammatory and glycemic markers may aid in early risk stratification and guide management in patients with MINOCA.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(13)
Memorial Ankara Hospital (TR), Ankara Bilkent City Hospital (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.