The Negative Effects of Self‐Focused Feedback on Mathematics Problem Solving

ABSTRACT Current theories offer competing hypotheses on whether feedback that includes the word “you” is beneficial for learning. We examined the effects of this self‐focused feedback on college students' problem solving. In Study 1, U.S. students ( N = 274, M age = 19.5 years) completed an online experiment in which they practiced probability problems in one of four conditions: with no feedback or self‐focused feedback, and in an evaluative context or a supportive context. Study 2 ( N = 177, M age = 20.1 years) only had an evaluative context but included a task‐focused feedback condition without the word “you” to determine whether the effects in Study 1 were unique to self‐focused feedback. ANOVA models showed that self‐focused feedback led to the lowest scores on the posttest with novel probability problems, and this was particularly evident for students who received more negative feedback. These results indicate that self‐focused feedback can have unintended consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70239
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Negative Effects of Self‐Focused Feedback on Mathematics Problem Solving

Emily Reeves Fyfe, Amanda Grenell, Nicholas A. Vest
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

The Negative Effects of Self‐Focused Feedback on Mathematics Problem Solving

Emily Reeves Fyfe, Amanda Grenell, Nicholas A. Vest
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Current theories offer competing hypotheses on whether feedback that includes the word “you” is beneficial for learning. We examined the effects of this self‐focused feedback on college students' problem solving. In Study 1, U.S. students ( N = 274, M age = 19.5 years) completed an online experiment in which they practiced probability problems in one of four conditions: with no feedback or self‐focused feedback, and in an evaluative context or a supportive context. Study 2 ( N = 177, M age = 20.1 years) only had an evaluative context but included a task‐focused feedback condition without the word “you” to determine whether the effects in Study 1 were unique to self‐focused feedback. ANOVA models showed that self‐focused feedback led to the lowest scores on the posttest with novel probability problems, and this was particularly evident for students who received more negative feedback. These results indicate that self‐focused feedback can have unintended consequences.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 40(4)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), University of Tampa (US)
National Institutes of Health
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.