Origins of Substituent, Ligand, and Counterion Effects in a Ruthenium-Catalyzed Aromatization-Driven C–C Bond Cleavage

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to elucidate the reaction mechanism of a ruthenium-catalyzed aromatization-driven C–C bond cleavage and to rationalize the experimentally observed trends in product selectivity, substituent-controlled reactivity, ligand dependence, and counterion effects. β-Carbon elimination is identified as the turnover-limiting step, governing both reactivity and product selectivity. Substituent-dependent selectivities are qualitatively reproduced: ESP and ETS-EDA analyses highlight electrostatic and transition-state interactions for alkyl substrates, while LOL-π reveals π-stabilization responsible for selectivity reversal in aryl systems. To clarify the origin of substituent-controlled reactivity, CDA analysis shows that increasing substitution progressively perturbs the balance between metal–substrate donation and back-donation, which elevates the β-carbon elimination barrier and thereby reduces catalytic efficiency. Ligand effects are found to arise from a multidimensional interplay among P–Ru–P bite angles, effective steric confinement, transition-state distortion, and ligand-to-Ru donation, rather than from any single geometric or electronic descriptor. Finally, distortion–interaction and LOL analyses demonstrate that the pronounced counterion effect originates primarily from excessive geometric distortion and reduced transition-state stabilization in the PF 6 – -assisted pathway, explaining the dramatic suppression of catalytic activity relative to OTf – .

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Published
2026-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.6c00499
Primary Topic
Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Origins of Substituent, Ligand, and Counterion Effects in a Ruthenium-Catalyzed Aromatization-Driven C–C Bond Cleavage

Juan Li, Keying Zhang, Ruifang Xie, Guanghui Song
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
article

Origins of Substituent, Ligand, and Counterion Effects in a Ruthenium-Catalyzed Aromatization-Driven C–C Bond Cleavage

Juan Li, Keying Zhang, Ruifang Xie, Guanghui Song
article en

Abstract

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to elucidate the reaction mechanism of a ruthenium-catalyzed aromatization-driven C–C bond cleavage and to rationalize the experimentally observed trends in product selectivity, substituent-controlled reactivity, ligand dependence, and counterion effects. β-Carbon elimination is identified as the turnover-limiting step, governing both reactivity and product selectivity. Substituent-dependent selectivities are qualitatively reproduced: ESP and ETS-EDA analyses highlight electrostatic and transition-state interactions for alkyl substrates, while LOL-π reveals π-stabilization responsible for selectivity reversal in aryl systems. To clarify the origin of substituent-controlled reactivity, CDA analysis shows that increasing substitution progressively perturbs the balance between metal–substrate donation and back-donation, which elevates the β-carbon elimination barrier and thereby reduces catalytic efficiency. Ligand effects are found to arise from a multidimensional interplay among P–Ru–P bite angles, effective steric confinement, transition-state distortion, and ligand-to-Ru donation, rather than from any single geometric or electronic descriptor. Finally, distortion–interaction and LOL analyses demonstrate that the pronounced counterion effect originates primarily from excessive geometric distortion and reduced transition-state stabilization in the PF 6 – -assisted pathway, explaining the dramatic suppression of catalytic activity relative to OTf – .

The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.