The impact of everyday acoustic environments on chronic pain mechanisms in fibromyalgia: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled 4 × 4 crossover trial

ABSTRACT: Given the limited efficacy of current therapeutic approaches, shifting the focus beyond individual-level factors toward environmental influences may offer potential complementary, nonpharmacological strategies for preventive and therapeutic purposes. The neuromodulatory effects of auditory stimuli have been shown to influence pain processing through central mechanisms. Given the heightened sensory sensitivity that characterizes fibromyalgia syndrome, everyday acoustic environments may represent a relevant yet understudied environmental determinant of chronic pain. To address this gap, this study investigated whether everyday acoustic environments modulate clinical outcomes and experimental indices of pain processing in fibromyalgia. A randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled 4 × 4 Williams crossover design was employed. Eighty-eight patients with fibromyalgia syndrome underwent 4 different 20-minute listening sessions: natural acoustic environments, urban acoustic environments, broadband sounds (active comparator), and silence (attention-placebo control). The primary outcome was pain intensity, while secondary outcomes comprised patient global impression of change and quantitative sensory testing measures, including mechanical pain sensitivity, temporal summation of pain, and pressure pain detection thresholds and intensity ratings. Prespecified covariates included pain catastrophizing, somatosensory amplification, and connectedness to nature. Linear mixed-effects models showed significant between-condition differences. After controlling for baseline values, exposure to urban acoustic environments worsened outcomes, with large effects for patient global impression of change and medium effects for pain intensity and static quantitative sensory testing measures compared with both control conditions. Pain intensity was predicted by pain catastrophizing. These findings suggest that auditory environments may function as clinically relevant environmental factors in chronic pain, bridging environmental neuroscience and chronic pain research, with potential implications for public health policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000004042
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of everyday acoustic environments on chronic pain mechanisms in fibromyalgia: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled 4 × 4 crossover trial

José Manuel Pérez‐Mármol, Dogukan Baran Gungormus
Pain
Noise Effects and Management
article

The impact of everyday acoustic environments on chronic pain mechanisms in fibromyalgia: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled 4 × 4 crossover trial

José Manuel Pérez‐Mármol, Dogukan Baran Gungormus
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Given the limited efficacy of current therapeutic approaches, shifting the focus beyond individual-level factors toward environmental influences may offer potential complementary, nonpharmacological strategies for preventive and therapeutic purposes. The neuromodulatory effects of auditory stimuli have been shown to influence pain processing through central mechanisms. Given the heightened sensory sensitivity that characterizes fibromyalgia syndrome, everyday acoustic environments may represent a relevant yet understudied environmental determinant of chronic pain. To address this gap, this study investigated whether everyday acoustic environments modulate clinical outcomes and experimental indices of pain processing in fibromyalgia. A randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled 4 × 4 Williams crossover design was employed. Eighty-eight patients with fibromyalgia syndrome underwent 4 different 20-minute listening sessions: natural acoustic environments, urban acoustic environments, broadband sounds (active comparator), and silence (attention-placebo control). The primary outcome was pain intensity, while secondary outcomes comprised patient global impression of change and quantitative sensory testing measures, including mechanical pain sensitivity, temporal summation of pain, and pressure pain detection thresholds and intensity ratings. Prespecified covariates included pain catastrophizing, somatosensory amplification, and connectedness to nature. Linear mixed-effects models showed significant between-condition differences. After controlling for baseline values, exposure to urban acoustic environments worsened outcomes, with large effects for patient global impression of change and medium effects for pain intensity and static quantitative sensory testing measures compared with both control conditions. Pain intensity was predicted by pain catastrophizing. These findings suggest that auditory environments may function as clinically relevant environmental factors in chronic pain, bridging environmental neuroscience and chronic pain research, with potential implications for public health policy.

Pain
Universidad de Granada (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ES)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.