Effectiveness of OsteoKing in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized, Double‑Blind, Double‑Dummy, Positive‑Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial
AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OsteoKing compared to a standard active comparator (Yaobitong capsules) for managing lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive-controlled, multicenter trial was conducted across 17 hospitals in China. A total of 210 eligible patients with LDH were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either OsteoKing (n = 140) or Yaobitong capsules (n = 70) for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score from baseline to week 4. Secondary endpoints included the Oswestry Disability Index score, the resolution rate of individual traditional Chinese medicine symptoms, and safety assessments. Missing data and repeated measures were handled using multiple imputation and a mixed-model for repeated measures. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well-matched between the two groups. At week 4, both groups experienced substantial improvements in pain and lumbar function. In the full analysis set (FAS), the between-group least squares mean difference (LSMD) in VAS reduction was -0.37 (95% CI: -0.77 to 0.03; p = 0.074). In the per-protocol set (PPS) analysis, the OsteoKing group achieved a significantly greater reduction in VAS scores compared to the control group (LSMD: -0.41, 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.01; p = 0.0453). Improvements in ODI scores were comparable between the groups in both the FAS and PPS analyses (p > 0.05). Additionally, the OsteoKing group demonstrated significantly higher resolution rates for low back pain and fatigue/lassitude at week 4 (p < 0.05). Both treatments were safe and well-tolerated, with comparable incidence rates of adverse events (21.43% vs. 24.29%, p = 0.6396). CONCLUSIONS: OsteoKing demonstrated comparable overall efficacy and safety to Yaobitong capsules in improving lumbar function and relieving symptoms in patients with LDH. Furthermore, OsteoKing may offer a modest, short-term analgesic advantage at the 4-week mark. OsteoKing represents a safe, effective, and viable conservative therapeutic option for LDH.
Authors
- Y Y
- Wei Fang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6261-7039)
- Wenjie Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6369-0004)
- Rongxin Sun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9742-2271)
- 马宏庆
- Yuan Pang
- Hao Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-5040)
- Fuhong Cheng
- Xuehui Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7505-3316)
- Ziqiang Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9190-9866)
- Yue Han
- Zhuoyun Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4093-2195)
- Baohong Mi
- Shiyu Dong
- Wenge Wang
- Weiheng Chen
- Jian Wei
- Kuayue Zhang
- Chao Ma
- Linlin Chen
- Shuangqing Du
- Peidong Qing
- Tao Fan
- Xiangrong Liu
Institutions
- Hebei Medical University (CN)
- Xinjiang Medical University (CN)
- Xuzhou Medical College (CN)
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN)
- Xian Central Hospital (CN)
- Hospital of Hebei Province (CN)
- Ansteel (China) (CN)
- Mianyang Central Hospital (CN)
- Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (CN)
- Shanxi Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Sichuan Mianyang 404 Hospital (CN)
- Taiyuan Iron and Steel Group (China) (CN)
- Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital (CN)
- Weinan Central Hospital (CN)
- Xuzhou Central Hospital (CN)
- Shanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (CN)
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College (CN)
- Urumqi General Hospital of PLA (CN)
- Shanxi Fenyang Hospital (CN)
- Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (CN)
- Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province (CN)
- First People's Hospital of Chongqing (CN)
- Anshan Hospital (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
- Published
- 2026-06-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.70140
- Primary Topic
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00