Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Acute Kidney Injury and Transfusion in One-Week-Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background/Objectives: Evidence on spinal versus general anesthesia in unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may not extend to one-week-staged bilateral surgery, where older patients receive two anesthetics in a short interval and intra-operative spinal-to-general conversion is common but rarely reported transparently. We compared peri-operative acute kidney injury (AKI) and transfusion between strategies in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 207 patients (414 surgeries) undergoing one-week-staged bilateral primary TKA at one center. Co-primary endpoints were creatinine-based AKI (patient level) and packed-red-blood-cell transfusion (surgery level). Because 42 general-anesthesia-classified surgeries had an attempted spinal injection, the primary analysis used the initial anesthetic plan (an intention-to-treat analogue), reclassifying these as spinal, with as-treated classification as a sensitivity analysis; AKI was modeled at the patient level (any general anesthesia versus spinal–spinal) and transfusion per surgery. Results: Median age was 75 years and 82.6% were female; AKI affected 74 of 207 patients (35.7%) and transfusion 185 of 414 surgeries (44.7%). The adjusted any-general-anesthesia versus spinal–spinal estimate was not statistically significant and opposite the spinal-protective hypothesis (adjusted odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.23–1.01, p = 0.054), and no pre-specified sensitivity scenario survived Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Transfusion did not differ between strategies; among secondary endpoints, length of stay, hemoglobin drop, peak C-reactive protein, and intra-operative hypotension likewise showed no significant difference after multiplicity correction. Conclusions: These hypothesis-generating findings do not support changing anesthetic practice; the choice should remain individualized. Approximately 12% of attempted spinal anesthetics converted intra-operatively to general anesthesia—a record-based observation, not a validated failure rate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15134937
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Acute Kidney Injury and Transfusion in One-Week-Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

J I Moon, Doo Sup Kim, Jaemin Lee
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Acute Kidney Injury and Transfusion in One-Week-Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

J I Moon, Doo Sup Kim, Jaemin Lee
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Evidence on spinal versus general anesthesia in unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may not extend to one-week-staged bilateral surgery, where older patients receive two anesthetics in a short interval and intra-operative spinal-to-general conversion is common but rarely reported transparently. We compared peri-operative acute kidney injury (AKI) and transfusion between strategies in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 207 patients (414 surgeries) undergoing one-week-staged bilateral primary TKA at one center. Co-primary endpoints were creatinine-based AKI (patient level) and packed-red-blood-cell transfusion (surgery level). Because 42 general-anesthesia-classified surgeries had an attempted spinal injection, the primary analysis used the initial anesthetic plan (an intention-to-treat analogue), reclassifying these as spinal, with as-treated classification as a sensitivity analysis; AKI was modeled at the patient level (any general anesthesia versus spinal–spinal) and transfusion per surgery. Results: Median age was 75 years and 82.6% were female; AKI affected 74 of 207 patients (35.7%) and transfusion 185 of 414 surgeries (44.7%). The adjusted any-general-anesthesia versus spinal–spinal estimate was not statistically significant and opposite the spinal-protective hypothesis (adjusted odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.23–1.01, p = 0.054), and no pre-specified sensitivity scenario survived Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Transfusion did not differ between strategies; among secondary endpoints, length of stay, hemoglobin drop, peak C-reactive protein, and intra-operative hypotension likewise showed no significant difference after multiplicity correction. Conclusions: These hypothesis-generating findings do not support changing anesthetic practice; the choice should remain individualized. Approximately 12% of attempted spinal anesthetics converted intra-operatively to general anesthesia—a record-based observation, not a validated failure rate.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(13)
Yonsei University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.