Patient Perspectives of Intestinal Ultrasound in IBD: A Quantitative Evaluation of Satisfaction and Diagnostic Preference

PURPOSE: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) has been shown to be an accurate, non-invasive, point-of-care tool for monitoring disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While its diagnostic performance is well-established, there is a notable gap in research related to patient perspectives regarding the role of IUS in IBD management, including its impact on the patient-provider relationship, which has not been previously studied. METHODS: We conducted a quantitative study with a 21-question Likert scale (0-10) survey administered to patients undergoing IUS during routine IBD clinic visits. Survey questions assessed four domains: (1) patient experience with IUS, (2) preference of IUS versus other diagnostic modalities, (3) impact on the patient-provider relationship, and (4) the enhancement of disease understanding. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients completed the survey. Overall, patients reported high satisfaction with IUS (mean score: 9.15), preferred IUS over bloodwork, stool testing, CT/MRI, and colonoscopy (mean score: 7.64), and felt it positively impacted patient-provider relationship (mean score: 8.07), and disease understanding (mean score: 7.74). IUS was strongly preferred over stool testing and colonoscopy (mean scores: 10 for both). Patients on steroids reported greater enhancement of the patient-provider relationship (8.70 vs. 7.82, p = 0.03), and those with Crohn's disease reported greater improvement in disease understanding compared to ulcerative colitis (8.16 vs. 7.18, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients expressed high satisfaction with IUS across all survey domains. These findings support the broader use of IUS into IBD care, highlighting its value not only as a diagnostic tool but also in enhancing patient experience and engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-026-10070-0
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Perspectives of Intestinal Ultrasound in IBD: A Quantitative Evaluation of Satisfaction and Diagnostic Preference

James C. Slaughter, Robin Dalal, D Beaulieu, Kacie H. Denton et al.
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Patient Perspectives of Intestinal Ultrasound in IBD: A Quantitative Evaluation of Satisfaction and Diagnostic Preference

James C. Slaughter, Robin Dalal, D Beaulieu, Kacie H. Denton, Elizabeth A. Scoville, David A. Schwartz, Audrey Bennett, Sara Horst, Baldeep S. Pabla
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) has been shown to be an accurate, non-invasive, point-of-care tool for monitoring disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While its diagnostic performance is well-established, there is a notable gap in research related to patient perspectives regarding the role of IUS in IBD management, including its impact on the patient-provider relationship, which has not been previously studied. METHODS: We conducted a quantitative study with a 21-question Likert scale (0-10) survey administered to patients undergoing IUS during routine IBD clinic visits. Survey questions assessed four domains: (1) patient experience with IUS, (2) preference of IUS versus other diagnostic modalities, (3) impact on the patient-provider relationship, and (4) the enhancement of disease understanding. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients completed the survey. Overall, patients reported high satisfaction with IUS (mean score: 9.15), preferred IUS over bloodwork, stool testing, CT/MRI, and colonoscopy (mean score: 7.64), and felt it positively impacted patient-provider relationship (mean score: 8.07), and disease understanding (mean score: 7.74). IUS was strongly preferred over stool testing and colonoscopy (mean scores: 10 for both). Patients on steroids reported greater enhancement of the patient-provider relationship (8.70 vs. 7.82, p = 0.03), and those with Crohn's disease reported greater improvement in disease understanding compared to ulcerative colitis (8.16 vs. 7.18, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients expressed high satisfaction with IUS across all survey domains. These findings support the broader use of IUS into IBD care, highlighting its value not only as a diagnostic tool but also in enhancing patient experience and engagement.

Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.