A scoping review of barriers and facilitators to implementing tele-mental health solutions for rural, remote and underserved populations in low- and middle-income countries

The increasing mental health gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) represents a significant global public health concern. Access to mental healthcare remains challenging due to stigma, lacking quality treatment options, and skilled workforce shortages. Tele-mental health, which involves remote access to care through information and communications technologies (ICTs) and mobile communication systems, may represent a promising solution. However, most research in this area has been conducted in high-income countries. This scoping review aimed to explore known barriers and facilitators to implementing tele-mental health solutions to populations in remote, rural, and underserved communities in LMICs to inform evidence-based development and implementation of digital interventions and strategies that can improve access to quality and affordable mental healthcare. Studies published between 2010 and 2024 were identified through comprehensive searches across four databases, namely PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and SpringerLink. Nine studies were included for analysis. Barriers and facilitators were categorised using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation = Behaviour (COM-B) model. A narrative synthesis revealed several barriers for patients, primarily related to limited physical and social opportunities, such as lack of mobile devices, unstable or limited internet access, and lack of private space at home. Barriers for mental health providers were predominantly linked to psychological capability, including insufficient knowledge concerning tele-mental health interventions. Time and cost efficiencies were key facilitators for both service users and mental health service providers, which enhanced access to care. Infrastructure development, educational initiatives, and training for providers are essential to create a more equitable tele-mental healthcare system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000903
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of barriers and facilitators to implementing tele-mental health solutions for rural, remote and underserved populations in low- and middle-income countries

David Lim, Rodrigo Ramalho, Bessie Malila, Virender Sorout et al.
PLOS Digital Health
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

A scoping review of barriers and facilitators to implementing tele-mental health solutions for rural, remote and underserved populations in low- and middle-income countries

David Lim, Rodrigo Ramalho, Bessie Malila, Virender Sorout, Lisa Ballard, Sandra Jumbe, Deniz Naghibi, Winnie W. S. Mak, Alexander Torbuck, Aysha Groen, Dingaane Msowoya, Jose G. Perez-Ramos, Sophie Leijdesdorff
article en

Abstract

The increasing mental health gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) represents a significant global public health concern. Access to mental healthcare remains challenging due to stigma, lacking quality treatment options, and skilled workforce shortages. Tele-mental health, which involves remote access to care through information and communications technologies (ICTs) and mobile communication systems, may represent a promising solution. However, most research in this area has been conducted in high-income countries. This scoping review aimed to explore known barriers and facilitators to implementing tele-mental health solutions to populations in remote, rural, and underserved communities in LMICs to inform evidence-based development and implementation of digital interventions and strategies that can improve access to quality and affordable mental healthcare. Studies published between 2010 and 2024 were identified through comprehensive searches across four databases, namely PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and SpringerLink. Nine studies were included for analysis. Barriers and facilitators were categorised using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation = Behaviour (COM-B) model. A narrative synthesis revealed several barriers for patients, primarily related to limited physical and social opportunities, such as lack of mobile devices, unstable or limited internet access, and lack of private space at home. Barriers for mental health providers were predominantly linked to psychological capability, including insufficient knowledge concerning tele-mental health interventions. Time and cost efficiencies were key facilitators for both service users and mental health service providers, which enhanced access to care. Infrastructure development, educational initiatives, and training for providers are essential to create a more equitable tele-mental healthcare system.

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 5(6)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), University of Auckland (NZ), University of Cape Town (ZA), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Maastricht University (NL), NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Millennium Engineering and Integration (United States) (US), University of Rochester (US)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, European Commission, Universiteit Maastricht, African Academy of Sciences, African Union, Worldwide Universities Network, African Union Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.