Unique Challenges of Multidisciplinary Clinical Science: Perspectives From a Multidisciplinary Team

Clinical-psychological research stands to benefit greatly from collaborations that incorporate perspectives from other disciplines. However, the challenges of such collaborative efforts are immense. In this commentary, we provide the perspectives of five frequent collaborators from distinct disciplines (clinical psychology, linguistics, affective and developmental science, vision science, and cognitive neuroscience). We outline three overarching challenges we have encountered during our collaborations: disciplinary bias (i.e., implicit and explicit beliefs about the best ways to gain knowledge), lack of multidisciplinary fluency (i.e., difficulty effectively communicating across disciplines), and inherent risk (i.e., the speculative nature and uncertain career prospects of multidisciplinary pursuits). We then discuss potential solutions to these challenges. We hope that by sharing our experiences and insights, we can promote more productive and impactful clinical science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251320322
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unique Challenges of Multidisciplinary Clinical Science: Perspectives From a Multidisciplinary Team

Claudia M. Haase, Victor Pokorny, Vijay A. Mittal, Matthew Goldrick et al.
Clinical Psychological Science
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Unique Challenges of Multidisciplinary Clinical Science: Perspectives From a Multidisciplinary Team

Claudia M. Haase, Victor Pokorny, Vijay A. Mittal, Matthew Goldrick, Katherine Damme
article en

Abstract

Clinical-psychological research stands to benefit greatly from collaborations that incorporate perspectives from other disciplines. However, the challenges of such collaborative efforts are immense. In this commentary, we provide the perspectives of five frequent collaborators from distinct disciplines (clinical psychology, linguistics, affective and developmental science, vision science, and cognitive neuroscience). We outline three overarching challenges we have encountered during our collaborations: disciplinary bias (i.e., implicit and explicit beliefs about the best ways to gain knowledge), lack of multidisciplinary fluency (i.e., difficulty effectively communicating across disciplines), and inherent risk (i.e., the speculative nature and uncertain career prospects of multidisciplinary pursuits). We then discuss potential solutions to these challenges. We hope that by sharing our experiences and insights, we can promote more productive and impactful clinical science.

Clinical Psychological Science
University of Dallas (US), Northwestern University (PH), University of North Texas at Dallas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.