Extension loss following ACL reconstruction: A narrative review of mechanisms and phase-specific management.

Extension loss is a prevalent and clinically debilitating complication following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Joint immobilization is widely recognized as a primary etiology of range of motion (ROM) restriction across various musculoskeletal pathologies. Even following ACLR, diminished joint excursion during activity likely contributes to the development of extension loss, and postoperative joint immobilization exacerbates extension loss by facilitating intra-articular adhesion formation. Although early mobilization strategies, such as continuous passive motion, have traditionally been the cornerstone of postoperative rehabilitation aimed at counteracting the deleterious effects of immobilization, this approach often fails to fully prevent or resolve extension loss. Translational research indicates that post-ACLR extension loss progresses through distinct biological stages. During the acute postoperative period, termed the active arthrofibrosis phase, intra-articular hemorrhage and subsequent inflammation trigger fibrotic responses, resulting in adhesion formation and joint capsule thickening. In the later residual arthrofibrosis phase, persistent fibrosis may lead to persistent extension loss despite resolution of inflammation. Crucially, the efficacy of therapeutic interventions is highly phase-dependent. Aggressive exercise during the active arthrofibrosis phase may paradoxically exacerbate inflammation and fibrosis, whereas mechanical loading during the residual arthrofibrosis phase may facilitate ROM recovery. In addition, adjunctive pharmacological and physical modalities targeting inflammation may mitigate subsequent fibrotic progression. This narrative review synthesizes clinical and basic research evidence to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying extension loss after ACLR and proposes a phase-dependent framework for its management. A paradigm shift toward biologically informed, timing-specific interventions is essential to minimize the risk of persistent extension loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14670/hh-25-113
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extension loss following ACL reconstruction: A narrative review of mechanisms and phase-specific management.

Akinori Kaneguchi
PubMed
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Extension loss following ACL reconstruction: A narrative review of mechanisms and phase-specific management.

Akinori Kaneguchi
article en

Abstract

Extension loss is a prevalent and clinically debilitating complication following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Joint immobilization is widely recognized as a primary etiology of range of motion (ROM) restriction across various musculoskeletal pathologies. Even following ACLR, diminished joint excursion during activity likely contributes to the development of extension loss, and postoperative joint immobilization exacerbates extension loss by facilitating intra-articular adhesion formation. Although early mobilization strategies, such as continuous passive motion, have traditionally been the cornerstone of postoperative rehabilitation aimed at counteracting the deleterious effects of immobilization, this approach often fails to fully prevent or resolve extension loss. Translational research indicates that post-ACLR extension loss progresses through distinct biological stages. During the acute postoperative period, termed the active arthrofibrosis phase, intra-articular hemorrhage and subsequent inflammation trigger fibrotic responses, resulting in adhesion formation and joint capsule thickening. In the later residual arthrofibrosis phase, persistent fibrosis may lead to persistent extension loss despite resolution of inflammation. Crucially, the efficacy of therapeutic interventions is highly phase-dependent. Aggressive exercise during the active arthrofibrosis phase may paradoxically exacerbate inflammation and fibrosis, whereas mechanical loading during the residual arthrofibrosis phase may facilitate ROM recovery. In addition, adjunctive pharmacological and physical modalities targeting inflammation may mitigate subsequent fibrotic progression. This narrative review synthesizes clinical and basic research evidence to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying extension loss after ACLR and proposes a phase-dependent framework for its management. A paradigm shift toward biologically informed, timing-specific interventions is essential to minimize the risk of persistent extension loss.

PubMed
Hiroshima International University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.