Effects of Network-Specific Training and Waveform Denoising on ML-Based Seismic Phase Picking

Abstract We train and evaluate the performance of deep learning based models for picking seismic phases from local, regional and teleseismic seismological datasets. The datasets for training and testing at regional and teleseismic distances are assembled based on bulletins provided by the International Monitoring System (IMS) of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO). In this study we test the potential of machine learning (ML) algorithms, namely phase picking and denoising, to potentially help with the detection and characterization of potential nuclear explosions. ML algorithms offer the chance of potentially faster operational procedures for the detection of explosive and non-explosive events at lower signal-to-noise ratios as currently. For training and testing on local distances a dataset provided by the German Federal Seismological Survey (GR) is used. The established phase picking algorithms PhaseNet and EarthquakeTransformer (EQT) are employed here in both original model form and with newly trained models. The network specific trained phase picker models are evaluated against other available models. We also test the influence that autoencoder based denoising has on the performance of deep learning based seismic phase picking. We train phase picking models on denoised data. We find that original models already generalize well on IMS and GR data. However training of network specific models improves predictions for teleseismic and regional distances. Application on denoised seismic waveforms necessitates dedicated models trained on denoised data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pure and Applied Geophysics
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-026-04025-9
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Network-Specific Training and Waveform Denoising on ML-Based Seismic Phase Picking

Andreas Steinberg, Yoann Cano, Catalina Ramos, Peter Gaebler et al.
Pure and Applied Geophysics
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
article

Effects of Network-Specific Training and Waveform Denoising on ML-Based Seismic Phase Picking

Andreas Steinberg, Yoann Cano, Catalina Ramos, Peter Gaebler, Mikael Freire
article en

Abstract

Abstract We train and evaluate the performance of deep learning based models for picking seismic phases from local, regional and teleseismic seismological datasets. The datasets for training and testing at regional and teleseismic distances are assembled based on bulletins provided by the International Monitoring System (IMS) of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO). In this study we test the potential of machine learning (ML) algorithms, namely phase picking and denoising, to potentially help with the detection and characterization of potential nuclear explosions. ML algorithms offer the chance of potentially faster operational procedures for the detection of explosive and non-explosive events at lower signal-to-noise ratios as currently. For training and testing on local distances a dataset provided by the German Federal Seismological Survey (GR) is used. The established phase picking algorithms PhaseNet and EarthquakeTransformer (EQT) are employed here in both original model form and with newly trained models. The network specific trained phase picker models are evaluated against other available models. We also test the influence that autoencoder based denoising has on the performance of deep learning based seismic phase picking. We train phase picking models on denoised data. We find that original models already generalize well on IMS and GR data. However training of network specific models improves predictions for teleseismic and regional distances. Application on denoised seismic waveforms necessitates dedicated models trained on denoised data.

Pure and Applied Geophysics
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (DE), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), CEA DAM Île-de-France (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.