Word-formation motivation: a comparison of English compounds and their Slovak equivalents

Abstract This study focuses on word-formation motivation, analysed through the lens of the onomasiological theory of word formation. The approach presented here extends beyond the selection of motivating constituents at the morphematic level, viewing word-formation motivation as a multi-level phenomenon based on creative decisions of a coiner made at the conceptual, onomasiological, and morphematic levels. The theoretical principles are supported by an analysis of the motivation underlying 150 English compounds from the LADEC database and their Slovak equivalents denoting the same objects. The data are analysed in terms of three types of structural relations: onomasiological structure, morphematic structure, and onomasiological type. The study addresses a research question: In which types of motivating structural relations do the languages converge or diverge? The findings reveal a high degree of correspondence in the onomasiological structure and the determining mark, with Onomasiological Type 3 emerging as the most frequent matching type. This points to a shared tendency to omit the Actional constituent (the determined mark) and prioritise economy of expression. Differences appear in the representation of the onomasiological base, largely reflecting structural divergence between English compounds and Slovak derivatives. The analysis highlights the procedural nature of word-formation motivation, with nearly half of the pairs exhibiting a high degree of motivational identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Folia Linguistica
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2025-0175
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Word-formation motivation: a comparison of English compounds and their Slovak equivalents

Lucia Gallová
Folia Linguistica
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

Word-formation motivation: a comparison of English compounds and their Slovak equivalents

Lucia Gallová
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study focuses on word-formation motivation, analysed through the lens of the onomasiological theory of word formation. The approach presented here extends beyond the selection of motivating constituents at the morphematic level, viewing word-formation motivation as a multi-level phenomenon based on creative decisions of a coiner made at the conceptual, onomasiological, and morphematic levels. The theoretical principles are supported by an analysis of the motivation underlying 150 English compounds from the LADEC database and their Slovak equivalents denoting the same objects. The data are analysed in terms of three types of structural relations: onomasiological structure, morphematic structure, and onomasiological type. The study addresses a research question: In which types of motivating structural relations do the languages converge or diverge? The findings reveal a high degree of correspondence in the onomasiological structure and the determining mark, with Onomasiological Type 3 emerging as the most frequent matching type. This points to a shared tendency to omit the Actional constituent (the determined mark) and prioritise economy of expression. Differences appear in the representation of the onomasiological base, largely reflecting structural divergence between English compounds and Slovak derivatives. The analysis highlights the procedural nature of word-formation motivation, with nearly half of the pairs exhibiting a high degree of motivational identity.

Folia Linguistica
University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik (SK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.